By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Analysis of Federal Election Commission records reveals that Donald Trump’s largest donors during his second term included tech CEOs and individuals with relatives facing legal challenges. Many of these donors, who had previously given little to political campaigns, contributed substantial sums to the Trump-affiliated super PAC, MAGA Inc. Among the notable donors were OpenAI CEO Greg Brockman and the CEO of Palantir, Alexander Karp. Some donors’ relatives later received leniency from the administration, leading to scrutiny, even though officials maintain those decisions were not influenced by donations.
Read the original article here
Trump’s biggest donors in 2025 were AI CEOs and relatives of criminals, report says. It’s a headline that, frankly, doesn’t shock me anymore. We’ve seen this movie before, haven’t we? A sitting, term-limited president accepting donations? It’s almost comical in its audacity, really. The idea that someone constitutionally barred from running again still needs financial backing raises some serious questions. Like, what exactly are these donations for?
Of course, the immediate thought is the potential for corruption. Accepting money from AI CEOs, a sector with immense influence and deep pockets, and relatives of criminals, who presumably have a vested interest in… well, let’s just say “favorable outcomes,” is a recipe for disaster in a democratic system. It’s almost like allowing our politicians to openly accept bribes isn’t the best idea for a functioning government. It brings up the classic argument: if a president is self-funded, then he is free from corruption.
The mention of relatives of criminals is particularly telling. It paints a picture of a network, a web of interconnected interests where favors are traded and loyalty is bought. It’s a stark reminder of the old adage: birds of a feather flock together. The families of those who have been pardoned or could be looking for pardons, especially during the second term of a presidency, is a red flag. The fact that the GOP majority in Congress seems to turn a blind eye to these actions only adds fuel to the fire. It reinforces the perception that the Republican Party has become something of a crime syndicate.
Then we have the AI CEOs. They could be donating to gain influence, to shape policy, or simply to curry favor. The power of AI is growing, and its potential impact on society is immense. The temptation for those in positions of power to align themselves with this powerful force is clear. The very idea that such powerful figures are donating, for what could be a thinly veiled bribe, is simply outrageous.
It all boils down to the classic “follow the money” principle. Where the money goes, influence often follows. We’re talking about a situation where the former president seems to be open about taking bribes. The fact that Trump’s post-presidency continues to be this dramatic confirms that America has become the single most corrupt country in the 21st century.
The article paints a picture of a government gone astray. Pardons for sale, a revolving door of corruption, and a blatant disregard for ethical standards. It’s a sobering reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and the need for a functioning system of checks and balances. The fact that this could be just the “on-book” donations is a chilling thought.
The whole situation seems so brazen, so open, that you can’t help but wonder if it’s intentional. Are they simply flaunting their power, knowing they can get away with it? Or are they so disconnected from the norms of a fair society that they genuinely don’t see anything wrong with what they’re doing?
The headline itself, “Trump’s biggest donors in 2025 were AI CEOs and relatives of criminals,” is almost like a line from a dystopian crime drama. It’s hard to imagine a more potent symbol of the rot that can set in when power is unchecked and accountability is absent. As some have asked, why is Trump still getting donations if he can’t run again? The answer is obvious: influence, favors, and a continued network of corruption.