By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a claim by former President Trump that Vladimir Putin had agreed to halt attacks on Ukraine due to cold weather, Russia launched a significant barrage of attacks. These attacks included over 100 drones and a ballistic missile, resulting in civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure, including a facility belonging to an American company. While Trump had stated Putin’s agreement not to strike certain cities, these attacks continued, prompting conflicting accounts from Ukrainian and Russian officials regarding any agreements made. Despite the ongoing aggression, the White House has yet to provide comment or explanation on the matter.
Read the original article here
Putin Attacks Ukraine Just Hours After Trump Claimed He Had Promised Not To, and the immediate reaction, honestly, is not shock. It’s almost…expected, isn’t it? The sheer audacity of it, the blatant disregard for promises, the utter lack of surprise that one or both of these figures might have been less than truthful – it’s all part of a familiar pattern. Putin, we’re reminded, is a liar. And Trump? Well, he seems perpetually surprised by the actions of someone he seemingly admires and even believes he can influence.
A broken agreement, it appears, was not about general hostilities but specifically about targeting energy infrastructure and, according to the Kremlin, avoiding strikes on Kyiv. But as we know, war doesn’t conveniently pause for agreements. The attacks on the Kharkiv and Kherson regions demonstrate the reality of the situation on the ground: a conflict that continues regardless of what was or wasn’t promised. The fact that Trump claimed Putin agreed not to strike Kyiv for a week, and then… well, the situation isn’t as clear cut as the promises suggest.
The details are always important. Was the agreement about *just* Kyiv? And if so, did Russian forces launch attacks elsewhere? The specifics matter, but the bigger picture remains depressingly clear. Trump’s apparent belief in his ability to negotiate with Putin, his reliance on Putin’s word, has once again been shown to be, at best, naive. Trump has been played. Again. The pattern has become so predictable that it’s almost comical.
It’s tempting to see this as a game. Trump makes claims, Putin does the opposite, and the world shakes its head. But there’s nothing funny about the real-world consequences of this ongoing dance. The deaths, the destruction, the displacement of people – that’s not a joke. And the fact that Trump’s actions continue to make him look foolish, while simultaneously potentially emboldening a leader like Putin, is deeply concerning.
The reaction, even among those who might support Trump, seems to be a weary sigh. It’s a template, this situation. The feeling is, “here we go again.” Trump says something, Putin does something else. This time, according to Trump, Putin promised not to fire on Kyiv and, apparently, made it all but immediately a lie. It’s a sad and infuriating display.
This whole situation highlights, yet again, a disturbing power dynamic. It’s a relationship where one side seemingly believes in some kind of special bond and the other side is using that to its advantage. Putin, in this scenario, comes off as the calculating, manipulative operator. Trump, on the other hand, comes across as either delusional or willfully blind, and as a result, he is getting played again and again.
The issue isn’t the fact that Trump is being lied to, so much as the fact he seems incapable of realizing it. Or, perhaps more worryingly, that he doesn’t care. His reaction, if there is one, is likely to be predictable: defensiveness, denial, and perhaps an attempt to shift the blame. Meanwhile, the actual people of Ukraine pay the price.
Ultimately, this whole situation is a symptom of something larger: a dangerous lack of trust and a disregard for international norms. The fact that a “promise” from Putin to Trump is considered to be of such little value underscores the precariousness of the current geopolitical landscape. The question now becomes: What does this mean for the future, especially considering the U.S.’s role? Will the U.S. continue to look weak? Will the U.S. lash out at the wrong target? It’s a bleak picture, a repeating cycle of broken promises and geopolitical maneuvering, where the human cost is tragically overlooked.