By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent Quinnipiac University poll reveals strong American opposition to the U.S. acquiring Greenland. The survey indicates that 86% of Americans oppose using military force to take over the Arctic island, while 55% are against purchasing it. This sentiment emerges as President Trump intensifies his push to gain control of Greenland, a move that has been met with resistance from Danish officials. The poll surveyed 1,133 registered voters between January 8th and 12th.
Read the original article here
86 percent in new poll against US taking Greenland by force. This staggering number paints a clear picture: the vast majority of Americans are vehemently against the idea of their country forcibly taking control of Greenland. The response is overwhelmingly negative, and it’s hard to ignore the sheer breadth of this opposition. The poll results are pretty damning, showing a strong consensus against any aggressive actions.
The comments surrounding this poll reveal a palpable sense of disbelief and a deep-seated concern about the implications of such a move. People are questioning the motivations behind any potential attempt to take Greenland, with many suspecting ulterior motives and even expressing fears of a compromised leader. The absence of a clear justification for this action is something that has many people worried.
The scale of the disapproval is particularly striking. People are wondering about the 14% who support the idea of forcibly seizing Greenland, and the reasons behind that support. The reaction is one of bewilderment, and outright anger, as people struggle to understand the rationale behind such a move, especially considering the potential geopolitical repercussions and the impact on international relations. Some people view this as a potential catalyst for larger global conflicts.
The concerns extend beyond the immediate act of taking Greenland. The poll has brought to the forefront anxieties about the erosion of democratic principles and the potential for an authoritarian turn. The prevailing sentiment is that public opinion seems to hold little weight. There’s a feeling that those in power are disregarding the will of the people, pushing forward with their agenda regardless of the consequences.
Furthermore, many people see a pattern in current political events, suggesting that this move is part of a larger agenda and it may be a trial run to see how the world responds. The potential impact on international relations is another major source of concern. The comments express worries about the potential for NATO to fracture, and the negative repercussions this would have for alliances and international stability.
The logistics of such an undertaking are also brought into question. The practical challenges of invading Greenland, with its harsh Arctic conditions and limited infrastructure, are highlighted. The comments emphasize the impracticality of such an operation, questioning the feasibility and the cost in terms of human lives and resources.
There are also more in-depth discussions about the real motivations behind any attempts at invasion. The comments mention the potential for rare earth deposits, and also about the political advantage it would give the “invading” country. The ice melt and the potential rise of water levels is also brought into the discussion.
The overall sentiment is one of extreme disapproval, skepticism, and apprehension. The poll results have ignited a flurry of commentary, highlighting the deep concerns of many regarding the future direction of the country. This response makes it clear that the idea of taking Greenland by force is unpopular and seen as a dangerous and ill-conceived proposition.
The focus shifts to the Republican Party as the main factor pushing the agenda to take Greenland. It’s viewed as a calculated power move and a reflection of a larger pattern of actions, including gerrymandering and other strategies aimed at consolidating power. Republicans are accused of refusing to hold the people in power accountable and are seen as enabling this.
The comments also reflect a profound sense of disillusionment and frustration, particularly when it comes to the 14 percent who support it. The use of strong language such as “idiots,” “psychos,” and “dumbfucks” underscores the intensity of the reaction.
Finally, the comments are a wake-up call, emphasizing the need for public vigilance and action. People are questioning how this is playing out right now and what will happen when Trump puts boots on the ground in Greenland. The 86% opposing the move should be seen as an indicator of the importance of this issue, and the strong reaction may be the start of bigger things to come.