By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As the twin pandas Xiao Xiao and Lei Lei prepare to return to China, Japanese panda fans gathered for their final public viewing at Tokyo’s Ueno Zoo. The pandas’ departure will leave Japan without pandas for the first time in half a century. This absence has raised concerns about the economic impact and the strained relations between Japan and China. Pandas have long been a symbol of goodwill and a beloved part of Japanese culture since their arrival in 1972, however, the pandas are likely to remain absent in Japan given the current political climate.
Read the original article here
The last 2 pandas in Japan are leaving for China as ties are strained, and it’s a situation that, frankly, seems a little absurd. The whole thing highlights this practice of “Panda diplomacy,” where China loans out these adorable, fluffy creatures to other countries. It’s a bit like China is saying, “See how friendly we are? We’re letting you borrow our national treasures!” But, of course, there’s always a catch, isn’t there?
The core issue here is that China owns all the pandas. Yes, you read that right. Regardless of where they are in the world, they belong to China. Countries don’t really *own* them, they are effectively leasing them, with the lease often including significant payments and, crucially, stipulations about any offspring. If any baby pandas arrive, guess what? They’re China’s property too. This puts Japan in the current position of returning the pandas, because the lease has expired. The pandas themselves aren’t exactly making the decision.
Given the current political climate, this isn’t just about the expiry of a lease. There’s a definite strain in relations between Japan and China. It’s hard not to see the pandas’ departure as a bit of a diplomatic statement, a sort of “We’re taking our toys and going home” move. The situation is complicated, but the fact that these bears are moving just as relations are becoming difficult speaks volumes. It’s a sad situation in a way, as the pandas, essentially, become political pawns.
Now, while this is happening, you’ve also got the issue of the pandas’ wellbeing. Some people who’ve visited the Ueno Zoological Gardens in Tokyo, where the pandas resided, have said the conditions weren’t ideal. Some describe the enclosure as small and cramped, while the overall state of animal welfare in Japanese zoos in general is considered somewhat questionable. Even if the current enclosures are relatively okay for a zoo, there’s a consistent feeling that animal welfare isn’t always the top priority. Of course, this is a generalization, and many zoos prioritize good animal care, but these concerns are definitely on the minds of some people.
From a different perspective, some are happy that the pandas are leaving Japan for China, hoping they’ll have a better life there. There’s a strong attachment to pandas within China. The Chinese people adore them, and the government faces pressure to ensure their well-being. Some believe that the government would go to lengths to protect the pandas, and that there are instances where the citizens would protest the government about this topic. There’s a feeling that China truly loves its pandas.
The concept of “Panda diplomacy” itself isn’t new. It’s been a tool used by China for years. It’s an interesting method of international relations, but it certainly has its drawbacks, particularly when the animals involved are cute, cuddly creatures that capture people’s hearts. It’s a bit disheartening to think of pandas being used as diplomatic leverage, especially when there are those who believe the animals’ best interests aren’t always being considered.
On the other hand, it’s also worth acknowledging that getting pandas for any zoo is a complex process. The Chinese government has very specific requirements and hurdles that zoos must meet. These requirements are so onerous that it deters many zoos from even trying. So, for the Ueno Zoo, getting the pandas in the first place would have involved considerable effort and political maneuvering.
The question also arises: What happens if a country just flat-out refuses to return the pandas? Well, that’s where the political muscle comes in. China is a global superpower, and they could, theoretically, impose trade tariffs or embargoes. They might even implement something akin to a “negative panda credit score” as a way of influencing behavior. So, realistically, it’s unlikely that a country would risk incurring China’s wrath over a pair of pandas.
Ultimately, the departure of the last two pandas from Japan is a reflection of the broader political landscape. It highlights the complexities of international relations and reminds us that, sometimes, even the cutest animals can become entangled in the web of diplomacy. The question isn’t just about the pandas; it’s about China’s influence on the world stage, and the lengths they will go to to promote their interests. The pandas’ fate, it seems, is tied to these larger currents.