By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe is calling for the immediate release of tribal members detained by ICE agents in Minneapolis. Three out of the four tribal members arrested have been transferred to an ICE facility at Fort Snelling, with one released from detention. The tribe has asserted that tribal members are not subject to immigration jurisdiction and has refused to enter an agreement with ICE. Concerns are raised due to the history of Fort Snelling and previous incidents of ICE detaining tribal members.
Read the original article here
Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention. The situation has ignited a wave of concern and outrage, bringing to the forefront issues of tribal sovereignty, historical injustices, and the current practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The Oglala Sioux Tribe is understandably distressed, as the detention of their members by ICE raises significant questions. The fact that these individuals, who are citizens of both the United States and the Oglala Sioux Nation, are being held in ICE custody is deeply troubling. The location of their detention at Fort Snelling, a site with a painful history for Native Americans, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. It’s hard not to draw parallels to the historical mistreatment of the Dakota people on the same grounds, highlighting the echoes of past injustices.
The core question that arises is, what are the charges, if any, that warrant ICE’s involvement? Considering their dual citizenship, what legal basis does ICE have for detaining them? If they’re not here through immigration, the entire concept of deportation becomes nonsensical. Where would ICE even deport them to? This very question underscores the absurdity of the situation and the potential for a severe overreach of power. The potential for a massive, highly profitable false arrest lawsuit for the detained tribal members looms, a natural consequence of what appears to be an illegal detention.
One of the more alarming aspects of the situation is the alleged attempt by ICE to leverage the release of the detained individuals. According to reports, Homeland Security is reportedly refusing to release further information unless the tribe enters into an “immigration agreement” with ICE. This sounds less like a standard legal procedure and more like a high-stakes negotiation. It’s a practice that’s reminiscent of a hostage negotiation, a particularly troubling notion when considering the agency involved and the inherent power imbalance.
The underlying context of this situation also brings to light the ongoing threats to tribal sovereignty. There’s a growing movement by certain groups and individuals seeking to undermine tribal governments and diminish Native American rights. The push to exploit tribal lands for resources, coupled with the efforts to abolish tribal governments, demonstrates a pattern of disregard for Indigenous self-governance. It’s a trend that’s been gaining traction, and this detention case appears to fit within that broader context.
This case is further complicated by the history of misinformation and ignorance surrounding Native American identity and rights. The lack of awareness among ICE agents, and the potential for confusion between Native Americans and other ethnic groups, is a significant problem. It exposes a deeper issue: the systemic failure to recognize and respect tribal sovereignty. Some individuals are reportedly being hassled for being “Mexican,” despite speaking a native dialect, the historical disrespect continues on.
The incident also highlights the vulnerability of marginalized communities. The fact that the detained individuals were homeless likely contributed to their targeting. It underscores the government’s harsh treatment of vulnerable populations. It seems ICE’s actions are driven by a lack of understanding of the situation and a desire to flex its authority, regardless of the legality or ethical implications. The cruelty, in essence, appears to be the point.
The call for the release of the detained tribal members is not only a matter of justice but also a demand for accountability. It requires a thorough investigation into the circumstances of their arrests and detentions. It necessitates a clear explanation from ICE as to why these individuals were targeted and what charges, if any, they face. The Oglala Sioux Tribe, along with allies, is rightfully seeking answers and demanding the immediate release of their members. The detention of these Oglala Sioux members, coupled with the larger issues of tribal sovereignty, ICE’s practices, and historical injustices, makes this case a critical one. It’s a reminder of the ongoing struggle for recognition, respect, and self-determination for Native American communities in the United States.