By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Mayor Mamdani announced his support for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during an appearance on ABC’s “The View,” citing the agency’s impact on communities. He previously expressed his support for abolishing ICE during his campaign and was outraged by a recent City Council employee detention. Mamdani’s stance aligns with a growing movement, evidenced by a recent poll showing significant support for abolishing ICE. However, his views contrast with other politicians like Governor Hochul, and received criticism from the Department of Homeland Security and the White House.
Read the original article here
NYC Mayor Mamdani calls for abolishing ICE as anger grows over Renee Good Minneapolis killing. It seems like a pretty clear stance to take in 2026, a bold move that could energize a particular base. There’s a feeling that half-measures aren’t the answer, that the moment demands decisive action. And frankly, the idea of finally dealing with ICE, an agency that seems to be overstepping its bounds, resonates with a lot of people. Some might even say that a sizable number of the agency’s personnel deserve to be held accountable for their actions.
The contrast with the current political landscape is stark. Many feel that the Democratic party leadership is hesitant, prioritizing a cautious approach. It’s refreshing to see someone, like Mayor Mamdani, taking a more aggressive stance. It’s a direct challenge to the establishment’s penchant for playing it safe. One can’t help but notice the frustration with the Democratic party’s approach, a feeling that they’re wasting valuable time on things that don’t resonate with voters. Instead, the focus should be on policies that genuinely address concerns, like the role of ICE.
The call to abolish ICE isn’t just a symbolic gesture; it’s a demand for real change. The idea of disbanding the Department of Homeland Security and the ATF, and holding individuals within ICE accountable for their actions, is compelling. The issue of criminal acts committed under the guise of ICE, especially considering the tragic case of Renee Good in Minneapolis, is something that sparks outrage. The call for abolishing ICE is more than a slogan; it’s a reflection of deeper sentiments. Some feel the agency should be dramatically scaled back, its focus narrowed, with only a few specialized personnel.
The history of immigration enforcement also comes to mind. Pre-9/11, before the creation of ICE, similar tasks were handled by existing agencies. The militarization of what should be a civil function is a key concern. The argument is that if a stroke of a pen funded ICE, it can be defunded too. It’s about more than just rhetoric; it’s about a fundamental shift in approach. It’s understandable to feel that abolishing ICE is the only truly “moderate” stance to take at this point.
However, the path forward isn’t entirely clear. It’s a complicated issue, intertwined with funding bills and legal complexities. While a complete abolishment is being demanded, practical challenges remain. The need for border control and enforcing immigration laws is acknowledged, but that doesn’t mean we should accept the excesses of an agency. The concern is with the organization’s actions, and the need for accountability.
This push reflects a wider dissatisfaction with the status quo. It’s a reminder of a need for strong leadership to take decisive action. The desire is for individuals who aren’t afraid to take a stand. This moment is not about playing it safe, but showing the guts it takes to tackle these issues.
It’s a moment when the Democratic party is again in danger of failing to present an effective platform for change. It seems like corporate Democrats are standing in the way of what many feel the country needs.
Perhaps there is a larger plan in play here. The idea of a new border agency formed from scratch is the direction to go, replacing the current organization’s functions. The agency needs to be reformed and re-evaluated to truly serve the people.
The message is clear: the current state of affairs isn’t acceptable. The call to abolish ICE and hold individuals accountable is not just about political posturing; it’s about justice, accountability, and the future of immigration policy.