By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a controversial move, Randolph County, North Carolina, commissioners voted to dissolve the entire library board. This decision followed the board’s refusal to ban the children’s book *Call Me Max*, which explores a young transgender boy’s journey. The vote was spurred by community members concerned about the book’s presence in the children’s section, despite the board’s adherence to existing policies. Commissioners expressed personal concerns, leading to a 3-2 vote to abolish the board, leaving the future of the library board uncertain.
Read the original article here
A county fired its entire library board for refusing to ban a trans children’s book. This is a story that immediately makes you feel a certain way, doesn’t it? A mix of disbelief, sadness, and perhaps a bit of anger. How can something like this happen? It’s a stark reminder of the battles being fought over very fundamental issues, like access to information and who gets to decide what we read. The idea that a whole board, made up of people committed to serving their community, was dismissed for upholding the principles of intellectual freedom is just…wrong.
It’s pretty striking that the book in question, the one that sparked this whole controversy, is the *only* one out of nearly 20,000 children’s books in the library that even touches on gender identity. Think about that for a moment. This wasn’t a library flooded with books on the subject, overwhelming young readers with a deluge of information. It was one book, and it clearly hit a nerve with some people in the community. The fact that it was deemed so threatening as to warrant the complete dismantling of the library board speaks volumes about the priorities of those who instigated this action.
The trustees, who were doing their jobs by following their rules and serving the whole community, were essentially punished for it. One trustee, Steve Grove, rightly pointed out that they rely on the expertise of trained librarians when making decisions about what goes on the shelves. This isn’t about personal opinions; it’s about providing access to a diverse range of perspectives and experiences. It’s also about trusting the professionals, the librarians who dedicate their careers to curating collections that serve everyone.
The author of the book, Kyle Lukoff, summed it up perfectly when he said, “A library’s entire board of trustees was fired and replaced because they refused to ban one of my books.” It’s a sentence that encapsulates the absurdity of the situation. It highlights the silencing of dissenting voices and the prioritization of a specific ideology over the principles of intellectual freedom and inclusion. This isn’t just about a book; it’s about control.
Some people feel that this situation reveals a deeper issue – the fear of knowledge and critical thinking. The argument goes that certain groups view knowledge as something to be feared, especially if that knowledge challenges their worldview. That’s why banning books becomes a tool to control the narrative, to prevent people from encountering ideas that might shake their beliefs. It’s a tactic used to protect a certain interpretation of the world, often one rooted in a specific religious or political ideology.
This situation in North Carolina isn’t just about this one book. It’s about a broader trend. It’s a message that expert review committees can be overruled, that local officials can ignore the voices of professionals and prioritize political agendas over the needs of the community. It’s a chilling reminder that intellectual freedom is fragile and must be constantly defended. It’s especially disheartening when these decisions are made by those who are supposed to be representing all the people in their county, not just a specific subset.
The firing of the library board sends a strong signal about the priorities of the county commissioners. It sends a message that access to information, especially information that challenges existing power structures or dominant ideologies, is something to be feared, not celebrated. It’s a blow to the values of free speech and the importance of open access to diverse ideas, something that is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.
It really feels like this is more about a culture war than anything else. It’s a clash of ideologies, where certain groups see anything that doesn’t fit within their narrow view as a threat. And in this case, the casualties are the library board, the principles of intellectual freedom, and ultimately, the community itself. It’s hard not to feel for the people in that community who cherish their library and understand its crucial role in providing access to information for everyone.
The fact that the KKK had a presence in Randolph County in the not-so-distant past, and that the school desegregation process is still under federal supervision, doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the county’s commitment to inclusivity. These are all signs of a culture where certain viewpoints have disproportionate power, and where the voices of marginalized groups are often silenced.
This whole episode is a reminder of the power of local politics and how quickly things can change. Elections have consequences, as they say. This case shows how those consequences can directly impact the daily lives of people and the values we hold dear. It’s a call to action for everyone who believes in intellectual freedom, diversity, and the importance of public libraries. If you care about these things, you need to be engaged and make your voice heard.