By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Governor Gavin Newsom has recently warned that former President Donald Trump intends to run for a third term, despite constitutional limitations. Newsom has stated that he received a Trump 2028 hat, signaling that Trump’s supporters are serious about a potential third term. This isn’t the first time Newsom has voiced such concerns, recalling a past Oval Office conversation where Trump alluded to a third term. Polling data indicates a significant portion of Republicans support the idea of Trump running for a third term.
Read the original article here
Gavin Newsom is sounding the alarm, and it’s grabbing everyone’s attention: Trump might try to run for a third term. It’s not just a possibility; it’s a real threat, and according to Newsom, we need to “wake up” to what’s happening. The sentiment is direct and stark – that if this election is “rigged,” the very foundation of the country could be at stake.
The clock is ticking, with roughly nine months until the elections. The urgent question that emerges is, “What can we do?” There is discussion about the traditional routes of protest and advocacy – marching, sending letters, discussing concerns with family and friends – but the real emphasis is on the need for action from Congress and the judiciary. The current administration and those within it, who still hold positions of influence, need to step up.
There’s the underlying issue of extreme wealth inequality. The argument is that the influence of ultra-wealthy individuals is a fundamental threat to democracy. Some view Newsom as being linked to powerful figures, as an extension of their agendas. The perception is that simply “less bad” isn’t a viable solution; the issue demands a stronger, more decisive response. The challenge lies in how to rein in the billionaires, the ones accused of aiding and abetting Trump’s potential return.
There’s a strong push to prevent complacency, especially within the Democratic primaries. The concern is that settling for the status quo will bring no real progress. The criticism is that some people might be ignoring the seriousness of the situation. Some are warning of potential civil unrest if Trump runs again. The global perspective is one of concern, with the world watching as the United States navigates its political instability. There’s a suggestion that countries might shift their trade and investments elsewhere, seeking more stable markets.
The analysis is harsh; the current political situation is destabilizing the country. Some think the polls suggest the Democrats should consider another candidate, such as Obama. Concerns are raised about potential actions like the FBI raiding election offices. There’s a sense that those in power aren’t taking the threat seriously enough. Trump is literally saying he’s going to “when” he rigs the election.
The frustration is palpable, with the criticism of Newsom’s actions. The view is that instead of focusing on the broader issues on a world stage, he’s declining. A key point here is that the Constitution sets the rules, but the executive branch’s willingness to enforce them is essential. If the rules are not enforced, the potential outcome could be a divided nation, with varying levels of allegiance and a high probability of conflict.
There are serious allegations about improprieties concerning the FBI and actions in certain election headquarters. The question is “Now what?” There is a clear accusation that the last election was rigged, and the suggestion is that this has created a dangerous precedent. The concern is the risk of the next election being rigged and how this makes a mockery of our democracy.
There’s a sense of urgency. The possibility of the election being rigged is not just a theoretical concern; it’s considered an active effort. There’s also some debate as to whether the election will even take place if Trump were to choose not to hold one. The ineffectiveness of the checks and balances that are in place, the limited actions of the senate and Congress is highlighted. There’s a general sense that the country is being “fucked” by an “orange weirdo”. The public needs to be actively engaged, rather than relying on others to address the situation. Betting market odds don’t seem to favor a second term being completed.
The need to find a suitable candidate to challenge Trump’s influence is clear, but Newsom is not the solution. Some people are calling for Newsom to take action, and if not, that he should stay out of the way. Newsom is criticized for a lack of courage and a willingness to compromise principles.
The central point is that Trump is not seeking a third term but rather the establishment of a permanent, perhaps even hereditary dictatorship. The individual’s health is called into question. There’s a concern that the country’s entire infrastructure has been altered. Many question the age of the possible candidates. Ultimately, the question is what will the government do about the insurrectionists? The suggestion is that we cannot assume a peaceful transfer of power from an individual who has already demonstrated a disregard for democratic traditions. The final call to action is to support organizations dedicated to protecting voting rights.