By Matt Underwood New Zealand declines Donald Trump’s invite to join Gaza “Board of Peace”. The news of New Zealand’s decision to decline Donald Trump’s invitation to join his proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza is hardly surprising. Considering the nature of the board, which many perceive as a veiled attempt to exploit a war-torn region for financial gain, it’s easy to understand why the invitation was met with resistance. Joining a board that seems more interested in extracting wealth than fostering actual peace is not something any self-respecting nation would readily embrace.
The list of countries declining the invitation to join this board is already quite extensive, including Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the UK, Norway, Sweden, Slovenia, Ukraine, Croatia, Greece, and Italy. One can safely assume that this list will continue to grow as more nations consider the implications of being associated with such an endeavor. It’s a clear indication that many countries recognize the dubious nature of this board and are unwilling to lend it any legitimacy.
The very concept of the board raises numerous questions and concerns, especially regarding its financial aspects. The reported cost of joining, a staggering one billion dollars, immediately delegitimizes the entire project. This enormous sum is a blatant red flag, suggesting that the primary objective is not peace but rather a massive payout for Donald Trump and his associates. It’s difficult to view this as anything other than a scheme to enrich those involved, rather than a genuine effort to help the people of Gaza.
The lack of any clear legal standing or oversight further exacerbates the concerns surrounding this board. Without proper ratification, international backing, or established mechanisms for accountability, it’s essentially a private club with the potential for exploitation. It’s no surprise that many countries see this as a dangerous precedent, where Trump can essentially dictate terms and conditions with minimal checks and balances.
This situation isn’t just about New Zealand; it’s a reflection of the wider geopolitical landscape. The Trump administration’s attempts to insert itself into international affairs, particularly in conflict zones, are viewed with suspicion by many. The idea of Donald Trump “running Gaza” seems absurd, given his track record and lack of diplomatic experience. He seems to view foreign policy as a reality show, where deals are made and broken on a whim, with little regard for the consequences.
It is interesting to note New Zealand’s long-standing relationship with the United States. New Zealand has been a steadfast ally of the U.S. in numerous conflicts, from World War I and II to the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and Afghanistan. The ANZUS treaty, a cornerstone of their defense relationship, has been in place since 1951. Despite this close alliance, New Zealand has made a sound and sensible decision. As a smaller nation, New Zealand has always taken pride in contributing what it could on the world stage, within its means. It is no small thing that its Government did what was right.
The potential for backlash from the Trump administration on nations that decline the invitation cannot be ignored. The previous administration’s use of intimidation tactics and threats of retaliation are well-documented. Despite these factors, New Zealand has made a clear and unequivocal statement. This bold stance, especially given the historical partnership, further illustrates the questionable nature of the invitation. It’s a testament to New Zealand’s commitment to principled foreign policy and its unwillingness to be associated with an exploitative venture.
The response to the invitation, as with Canada, underscores the perception that the board is a scheme designed to benefit Trump and his associates. The fact that the financial aspects and the lack of oversight have been called out, shows a consensus that this board isn’t about peace. The offer itself should be taken with skepticism, and the refusal, a sign of respect and integrity.