In response to the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis, over half of House Democrats are now backing a resolution to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. This effort, spearheaded by Rep. Robin Kelly, has gained support from both progressive and moderate Democrats, including Senator Jacky Rosen, who has also called for Noem’s impeachment. The push for impeachment follows criticism of Noem’s handling of the situation and the actions of ICE agents in Minneapolis. However, it is unlikely the resolution will pass due to lack of Republican support in both the House and Senate.

Read the original article here

More than half of House Democrats back impeachment, this seems to be the main point of discussion. The reaction is pretty strong, and there’s a lot of frustration brewing. The initial shock seems to be over the number – the fact that it’s *not* a unanimous decision is clearly a sore point. People are asking, “Why not all of them?” and expressing disbelief that some Democrats aren’t fully on board. It’s almost as if there’s an expectation of unwavering support, and anything less is seen as a betrayal.

This sense of disappointment is palpable. The sentiment is that this isn’t just about politics; it’s about a fundamental moral stance. The focus is squarely on Kristi Noem, and those who aren’t supporting the impeachment push are being called out. The fact that the article is from Fox News, and potentially “rage baiting,” is brought up, but the core issue of a lack of unity among Democrats remains the central concern. The difference between sponsoring a bill and voting for it is also a point of confusion for some, and highlights the need to understand the legislative process.

The disappointment over the split among Democrats reveals a deeper issue – a lack of faith in the current political landscape. There’s a clear call for a complete overhaul, with the less supportive Democrats being described as “spineless” and “pathetic.” The feeling is that the opposition is not strong enough, and that more radical action is needed. There’s a lot of anger directed toward anyone who isn’t 100% on board with the impeachment. The question comes up of why the dissenting Democrats still “have jobs” and that “they need to be voted out”.

This level of outrage points to a broader frustration with the political status quo, the inability of Democrats to present a united front, and the urgency felt by some supporters for impeachment. This perspective is a call for “scorched earth” tactics and highlights the urgency with which some people want to address these issues. This is also not just about the numbers; it’s also about a perceived lack of commitment. People are angry that the Democrats are “not fighting” for what they believe in.

One thing that keeps coming up is the demand for 100% support. The insistence on this number indicates a black-and-white view of the situation, where anything less than full backing is unacceptable. The issue is that the call is for impeachment, which has real consequences, and there is a lot of anger about anyone not being fully committed to this one outcome. There is concern about the political implications of this position, and how this relates to broader frustrations within the Democratic party.

The anger is also directed toward “bootlicking” and “old-school” Democrats who are not representing their constituents. There’s a clear desire for progressives who will stand firm and push for the changes they promised. It’s about a political paradigm shift where the old guard is seen as an obstacle to progress. There are calls to replace these Democrats with those who will push for “functional opposition.”

The discussion suggests the underlying feelings of anger and disappointment. It highlights the depth of frustration with the current political system and the need for greater unity and more decisive action. The core issue is that many view Kristi Noem as someone who should be impeached, and anyone who isn’t on board with that view needs to be replaced.