By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Federal agents in tactical gear fatally shot a man in Minneapolis, escalating tensions amidst an ongoing immigration crackdown orchestrated by the Trump administration. This killing, occurring near previous incidents of police brutality, has ignited outrage from local officials and the public, who accuse the administration of creating a climate of fear and violence. The deployment of heavily armed ICE agents, often operating with impunity and exceeding local police presence, mirrors an authoritarian strategy reminiscent of historical persecutions. The article suggests this is a deliberate targeting of a Democratic-led, Black-led city where Trump lost the elections. The author implies that this may be a turning point, urging decisive action to counter the president’s actions.
Read the original article here
‘This is what fascism looks like’: terror in Minneapolis reminiscent of civil war.
The stark reality is that filming government agents can now lead to being labeled a “domestic terrorist,” and that statement, chilling in its implications, seems to capture the current state of affairs. The events unfolding in Minneapolis, the site of violence and disregard for human life, evoke a sense of dread. It’s difficult to avoid the feeling that something profoundly disturbing is happening in the United States, a slide into a darkness that those in power seem unwilling or unable to address. The potential for the situation to escalate into something far worse feels palpable, as if a second civil war is already underway, though not officially declared.
Minnesota, with its large Somali community, becomes a focal point for the animosity displayed by certain political figures. The rhetoric being used, the open disdain expressed towards certain groups, are all warning signs. Historical parallels are being drawn, comparing the current climate to the rise of oppressive regimes, where those in power utilize tactics of fear and intimidation to maintain control. The actions of agencies like ICE, and the perception of a parallel between their behavior and that of groups like the SA and Tonton Macoute, is especially concerning. This is no longer a matter of mere political disagreement; it has become a struggle against what many see as a state-sanctioned reign of terror.
The question of whether America has become more violent, more divided, and more dysfunctional under the current political climate is not a simple one, and it certainly doesn’t have a clear answer. However, the evidence is mounting, and the events in Minneapolis are, tragically, just the latest examples. This is not simply a matter of partisan disagreement. It’s an ongoing, violent phenomenon with a clear goal.
The potential for civil unrest is a major concern. The idea of armed militias, whether state-sanctioned or not, roaming the streets, meting out violence and disregarding due process, is a terrifying prospect. The fact that the choice is seemingly between immediate conflict and a slow, creeping slide into fascism is a stark one. The media coverage, or lack thereof, adds to the sense of a nation sleepwalking towards a crisis. The deliberate silencing of news, the diversion of attention, feels like a calculated strategy to obscure the truth.
The fact that the police in the area seem to be complicit is what is driving the fear. This is becoming a full-blown crisis where the very institutions meant to protect citizens are seemingly being subverted for the ends of those in power. It’s a stark reminder of the importance of recognizing the signs of an encroaching dictatorship. This is no longer simply a matter of political disagreement.
Many fear the loss of liberty. Americans may have a very difficult time defending their freedom and safety. A difficult decision between immediate conflict or a slow, creeping slide into fascism is weighing heavily on many.
The response from the government, or lack thereof, is also indicative of the crisis. Some believe that the goal is not merely to enforce the law, but to intimidate, to silence dissent, and ultimately, to control. The idea that actions such as filming government agents are enough to be considered acts of terrorism only increases the levels of concern. The only conclusion that may be drawn by some is that what’s occurring is a deliberate effort to suppress any opposition.
One of the most ominous aspects of the current situation is the apparent normalization of violence, the acceptance of atrocities as a tragic but inevitable consequence. The idea that the only way to avoid civil war is to submit to fascism is a terrible conclusion. Some consider it the choice between open conflict now and fascism in the near future. The response from the citizenry, the willingness to defend rights and freedoms, is being severely tested.
The rise of the “highwaymen, thugs, and gangsters”, who operate outside the bounds of law, conduct warrantless access of homes and businesses, and abduct people is a grave issue. It is a sign of a society in decline. Some are suggesting ways to counter the encroachment of authoritarianism, like encouraging citizens to arm themselves and form neighborhood watch groups.
The underlying problem remains: a government that seems less concerned with the well-being of its citizens than with maintaining control. The current administration has little incentive to protect the citizenry, and many wonder, what happens when peaceful protest goes unheard? What happens when executions in the street are the norm? A significant part of the populace appears to feel that it is too late to change anything.