By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to a fatal shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent during a protest, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey vehemently demanded that ICE leave the city. Frey stated that ICE’s presence created chaos and distrust, directly contradicting its purported safety mission. Preliminary information indicated that a U.S. citizen was shot by an ICE agent, prompting calls from other city officials for the federal agents to depart. While the investigation continues, officials maintain the shooting was predictable, given the agency’s history.
Read the original article here
Mayor Tells ICE ‘Get F**k Out’ After ICE Kills U.S. Citizen, a phrase laden with raw emotion and a stark condemnation of federal overreach, encapsulates the outrage and frustration stemming from a tragic event.
This event, the shooting death of a U.S. citizen by an ICE agent during a protest, sparked immediate and forceful reactions. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey’s response, a direct and unvarnished demand for ICE to leave the city, sets the tone for the discussion. It signifies a profound loss of trust in the agency and a failure to uphold its purported mission of safety. Frey’s words, “Get the fuck out,” represent a breaking point, a moment where the city’s leadership openly rejects the presence and actions of a federal entity. He cited that the agency’s presence was actually causing harm, ripping families apart, terrorizing residents, and ultimately, resulting in the death of a citizen.
The comments surrounding this incident paint a picture of deep anger. One common sentiment expresses concern about accountability, or the lack thereof. The question is posed: what prevents someone from impersonating an ICE agent and committing acts of violence, if there are no consequences? The implication is that the agency’s actions, and the perceived lack of repercussions, create a climate of impunity. A need for swift action is expressed. Arrests, charges for murder, and investigations are demanded to ensure the agent is held responsible for their actions.
The description of the shooting itself, as presented in the linked videos, strongly suggests a case of homicide. The narrative portrays a situation where the driver of a vehicle attempted to leave a blocked road. The ICE agent is described as confronting the driver, before firing shots, resulting in the woman’s death. The lack of de-escalation tactics, along with the physical evidence, solidifies the impression of a tragic and unjustifiable act.
There are calls for the Governor to mobilize the National Guard to protect the public from ICE, reflecting a loss of faith in the agency and a growing sense of the threat it poses to local communities. The potential for invoking the National Guard highlights the gravity of the situation and the depth of the distrust. The commenter believes ICE has become an enemy of the citizenry.
The lack of investigation, transparency, and accountability is also compared to standards in other countries. In the UK, for instance, a shooting by a firearms officer triggers an automatic investigation. In this case, there are worries that ICE operates under a different set of rules. The perception is that ICE is enabled by those in power. Trump, SCOTUS, and others are directly blamed for the current situation.
The focus on the ICE agents’ actions also extends to their anonymity, as it is argued they should not be allowed to cover their faces. There is a sense that the secrecy allows these agents to act without fear of consequences, as it creates an environment of distrust and suspicion. The anonymity hides their identities and shields them from accountability, further fueling the perception that ICE operates above the law.
The overall sentiment is one of disgust. The “I didn’t vote for this” crowd, who may have remained silent, are being called out, as the events have shaken the sense of safety that citizens should be able to rely on in their community. The event highlights the emotional depth of the situation and the desire for change.
The comments also point out what some believe is the hypocrisy within certain circles. The comparison to other situations, such as the Ashli Babbitt incident, is made. There’s a question of whether the same outrage and concern are expressed when an individual is killed by an ICE agent. This type of comparison highlights the double standards, and how political views can shape the perception of events.
The call for action is clear. People want the arrest of the ICE agents, the involvement of local law enforcement, and for those in positions of power to take a stand. This also includes the calls for the need to abolish ICE. There is a demand to stop the violence. The sentiment is that if the local police are unable or unwilling to act, then there is a call to deputize citizens. This shows just how fed up some citizens are with the current state of affairs.
In essence, the response to the ICE killing is one of profound outrage, a demand for justice, and a deep-seated distrust of a federal agency perceived as operating outside the bounds of the law and at odds with the safety and well-being of the American people.