By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, teenage spa workers from Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago allegedly made house calls to Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion. The report indicates that Trump instructed staff to treat Epstein favorably, despite him not being a club member. However, the house calls reportedly ceased in 2003 after an 18-year-old worker accused Epstein of sexual pressure, prompting Trump to ban him from spa services. The article also mentions a recent release of documents by the Department of Justice which contained unfounded and false claims against Trump, in addition to mentioning a disturbing account from a former limo driver.
Read the original article here
Mar-a-Lago Spa Would Send Teen Workers on House Calls to Jeffrey Epstein’s Mansion: ‘A new report from the ‘Wall Street Journal’ reveals new ties between Epstein and President Donald Trump’ paints a troubling picture that demands serious consideration. The recent report from the Wall Street Journal lays bare disturbing details about the connections between Donald Trump and the late Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding the spa at Mar-a-Lago.
The core of the story revolves around the Mar-a-Lago spa and its apparent use of teenage workers. According to the report, these young employees were allegedly sent on house calls to Epstein’s residence, raising significant concerns about the nature of these interactions. The fact that the spa was allegedly employing teenagers at all immediately raises eyebrows, especially considering the professional standards and legal requirements typically associated with such services, like massage therapy and cosmetology. It’s hard to ignore the implications of sending minors to the home of a known predator.
The report also highlights that Epstein, despite not being a dues-paying member of the club, was allegedly treated as a valued guest by Trump’s staff. This preferential treatment, coupled with the spa’s provision of services to Epstein, suggests a level of familiarity and, potentially, complicity that is deeply concerning. The Wall Street Journal article notes that the spa employees reportedly warned each other about Epstein, describing him as sexually suggestive and prone to inappropriate behavior. This adds another layer of gravity to the situation, as it implies that the spa staff was aware of the risks involved in interacting with him.
It’s easy to see why people are so upset. It’s not just a matter of someone known as a “creep” receiving services. It’s the potential exploitation of young people, and possibly a lot more. The allegations imply that Trump wasn’t just a casual acquaintance of Epstein, but that their relationship involved using the spa’s employees for some purpose. The comments make it clear that some see this as evidence of trafficking and a long-term pattern.
The narrative extends beyond the immediate allegations, questioning the broader implications. The article is drawing attention to the potential for underage prostitution. The financial aspect of these arrangements adds another dimension, suggesting a systematic operation rather than isolated incidents.
Some of the comments point to Trump’s stated reasons for distancing himself from Epstein, such as Epstein poaching his employees. This is often framed as a deflection, and some people note it as a sign of his transactional nature and willingness to exploit others for personal gain. The use of the spa and its employees suggests an environment where exploitation was not only possible but perhaps even encouraged.
The question of why teenagers were being sent offsite and the apparent cover-up attempts is what is being raised. What were the specific services provided, and what was the true nature of Epstein’s relationship with Trump? The suggestion of a broader operation, potentially involving immigration paperwork and the control of these young women, raises the stakes even further. The comments underscore the feeling that there needs to be an investigation, and that the silence of some figures who may have been involved in such activities is problematic.
The timing of this is also important. The narrative underscores that the GOP knew about the behavior and was trying to cover it up. The implication of the allegations is a systematic betrayal of trust, and the sense of outrage is understandable. The questions being raised go to the heart of accountability, and the article is just raising those important points.
The revelations bring up a lot of concerns. This is a story about the potential exploitation of young people, as the article notes. The questions are about the truth of what happened at Mar-a-Lago.