By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The coalition of willing countries currently provides all international support for Ukrainian military resistance. French President Emmanuel Macron stated that this coalition, comprising 34 nations, finances 100% of Ukraine’s war efforts. France is a key contributor, supplying two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence capabilities. The coalition is committed to deterring aggression and supporting Ukrainian resistance, as demonstrated by the recent declaration following a meeting in Paris.
Read the original article here
Macron: Coalition of the Willing provides 100% military support to Ukraine
It’s pretty striking to hear that the “Coalition of the Willing,” spearheaded by France, is now providing 100% of the military support for Ukraine. That’s a bold statement by President Macron, and it signals a significant shift in the landscape of this conflict. This essentially means that the financial burden of the war effort is being shouldered entirely by this coalition of 34 nations.
What this implies, frankly, is that the United States’ influence over the war’s trajectory is lessening. This could be seen as a proactive measure to ensure Ukraine’s continued security, regardless of any potential fluctuations in the U.S.’s involvement or direction. The increased focus on an “Integrated Franco-British” command structure further highlights this point, solidifying the commitment of two major European powers with nuclear capabilities.
France, being a member of the EU, is well-positioned to lead this initiative from the EU side. The UK, despite its history of close ties with the U.S., also plays a crucial role. This coalition of the willing is truly stepping up. It’s commendable that figures like Starmer and Macron are taking such a strong stance on the international stage.
While the U.S. is expected to contribute a significant portion of the financial support – potentially 70% – it’s worth considering the shift in responsibility. The move to providing all support, spearheaded by France, demonstrates a resolve to maintain the flow of resources to Ukraine. Macron’s statement that France provides two-thirds of the intelligence to Ukraine further cements the country’s dedication to its ally.
The US still has influence, of course, because of its control of certain weapons, but they are not the primary drivers anymore. It’s a complex situation, with multiple players exerting varying degrees of influence. This support, combined with the efforts of the UK and other nations, is crucial for Ukraine’s defense. The coalition’s commitment extends beyond immediate military needs, with plans for post-war security guarantees, including ceasefire monitoring, rebuilding the Ukrainian army, and providing second-level security guarantees.
This shift in responsibility has consequences. The US could still attempt to exert leverage by withdrawing support or applying pressure through various means, such as disrupting intelligence sharing or halting the supply of weapons. The US military’s industrial complex is not in control of Ukraine’s supply chain anymore. This situation may well result in the rise of a European military industrial complex.
The reality is that Europe could emerge from this conflict in a stronger position, more independent and with its own military capabilities. The creation of such a strong coalition is, ultimately, a positive development. It would be a monumental shift of global power.