By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Speaking on Fox News, Venezuelan opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado revealed she last spoke with U.S. President Donald Trump on October 10, 2025, the day her prize was announced. Machado, who has been abroad since accepting the award, plans to return to Venezuela soon after the U.S. launched strikes against the country. She welcomed the U.S. actions, which included the capture of President Nicolas Maduro, as a positive step. However, President Trump has since dismissed the idea of working with Machado, citing a lack of support for her within Venezuela.
Read the original article here
Venezuela opposition leader Machado says she hasn’t spoken to Trump since October. This is a headline that immediately sparks curiosity, especially given the history between the two. One can’t help but wonder what the dynamic was, and what might have changed to cause this apparent silence. It’s a situation that invites speculation and highlights the unpredictable nature of international relations and personal interactions within the political arena.
The timing of this revelation is particularly interesting. The fact that the last communication was in October raises questions about the current state of affairs. Have there been shifts in political strategies? Disagreements on policy? Or perhaps a simple fading of interest? These are all valid questions to ponder. The silence could be a strategic move, a sign of frustration, or something entirely different. Without any context, it’s difficult to ascertain the specific meaning behind the lack of communication.
The comments surrounding this subject are very interesting. Many people believe that Trump’s actions were driven by personal motivations, and that Machado’s lack of communication with him now is a result of some perceived slight, mainly the Nobel Peace Prize. It is believed that Trump is more interested in satisfying his ego than supporting the interests of others. This perspective suggests that any prior engagement was purely transactional, and once Machado lost her perceived value, the relationship evaporated. Some opinions lean towards the belief that Trump only cares about himself.
The potential for a power shift is also an important element. If Machado and Trump were once in communication regarding Venezuela, what could this lack of communication signal? Could it potentially reflect a change in the political strategy regarding Venezuela? Perhaps a shift in the political landscape is being orchestrated, one which would leave Machado out of the equation.
The prevailing sentiment appears to be that Trump is motivated by ego and self-interest, not by a genuine concern for democracy or the well-being of Venezuelans. This perspective paints a picture of a transactional relationship, where Machado’s value was tied to her ability to further Trump’s agenda. Once that perceived value diminished, the communication ceased.
The focus on the Nobel Peace Prize reveals a potential catalyst for the current situation. The general consensus appears to be that Trump was angered by Machado’s receipt of the award. The thought is that the situation has evolved into Trump holding a grudge. This highlights the personal nature of some of the interactions and decisions. It is a sobering thought to consider that the fate of a nation’s opposition leader could be impacted by something as personal as a perceived insult or slight.
The underlying implications of Machado and Trump’s lack of communication go beyond a simple missed phone call. It speaks to the complexity of political alliances, the influence of personal vendettas, and the ever-shifting landscape of international relations. The situation will continue to evolve, so one must remain skeptical and check sources before making any conclusions.