By John Q. Hosedrinker 
James Cameron recently discussed his move to New Zealand on “In Depth with Graham Bensinger,” citing the country’s handling of the pandemic and its population’s embrace of science as key factors. He contrasted New Zealand’s “sanity” and sense of community with the polarization and scientific skepticism he perceives in the United States. Cameron has previously revealed his New Zealand citizenship was “imminent,” and has expressed his satisfaction with the culture of the country, and that it is a safer place. He stated he preferred a place that prioritizes common goals, which is something he feels the United States currently lacks.
Read the original article here
James Cameron’s assessment of America, as a place seemingly on the brink, paints a rather bleak picture, and it’s one he apparently felt compelled to escape. His comments, delivered after leaving the U.S., struck a chord, touching on several sensitive nerves regarding the current state of American society. He voiced concerns about a nation deeply divided, where animosity seems to be the norm, and where a distrust of science is alarmingly prevalent. He suggests the country is ill-prepared for another health crisis, implying an impending collapse if faced with another pandemic.
The reactions to Cameron’s departure and his words are predictably mixed. Some view his departure as the ultimate luxury afforded to the wealthy, the ability to simply “fuck off” when things get tough. Others acknowledge the validity of his observations, recognizing the deep-seated societal issues he highlights. The ability to leave, especially to a place like New Zealand, which seems to be a haven for wealthy Americans, underscores a sense of detachment from the problems he critiques. It’s easy to judge a situation from afar, especially when one is insulated from the consequences.
The core of Cameron’s critique centers on the level of division and animosity he perceives within the American populace. It’s a sentiment echoed by many, across various political and social circles. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a particularly poignant example of this division, where even basic public health measures became politicized and fiercely debated. He alludes to the rise of anti-science sentiment, a trend that endangers critical infrastructure and future progress.
The response to Cameron’s remarks also highlights a common resentment toward the wealthy. The ability to simply relocate when faced with challenges others must endure is viewed as a privilege, something reserved for the elite. This disparity in resources and opportunities fuels a sense of disconnect and can cause deep-seated animosity toward the rich. They benefit from American society but abandon it during times of trouble.
There is also, perhaps, a degree of defensiveness in the reactions. Some may see Cameron’s words as an indictment, a judgement passed on the country they call home. It’s easier to dismiss the criticism, especially if it comes from someone who has earned their fortune within the system they are now criticizing. Yet, the fact that a prominent figure like Cameron is departing, and vocalizing these views, suggests a broader sense of unease.
The critiques also touch on the hypocrisy that can arise when the wealthy and famous, who have benefited from the American system, express dissatisfaction and leave. It opens a debate on the role of wealthy citizens in a democratic society. Is it a moral obligation to engage and contribute, or is it permissible to seek greener pastures when the landscape becomes unpleasant? The argument here, is that the wealthy should be helping to fix the issues, not running away from them.
Cameron’s move and his words underscore some of the most pressing challenges facing the United States. His observations reflect the current political climate, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the complex relationship between wealth, power, and responsibility. His leaving is not necessarily an indictment of America as a whole, but it may be a symptom of a deeper malaise, a sign that the country is struggling with its identity and its future direction.