By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In his first public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, former Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump. Smith stated that he stood by his decisions, asserting that the investigation revealed proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Trump’s criminal activity. He elaborated on the charges, mentioning Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the illegal retention of classified documents, including sensitive national security information stored in insecure locations. Smith emphasized his commitment to the rule of law, indicating that he would prosecute a former president based on the same facts today and that no one should be above the law.
Read the original article here
Jack Smith Goes Scorched Earth on ‘Criminal’ Trump
It’s pretty clear: Jack Smith believes Trump is a criminal. And frankly, a lot of us agree. Considering the accusations, the evidence, and the legal battles, it’s hard to argue otherwise. From the perspective of many people, it’s a critical moment for accountability. After all, isn’t it the job of elected officials to hold people accountable for their actions, especially when those actions potentially undermine the foundations of our democracy? Smith’s approach, described by many, is not about “scorched earth,” but about presenting the facts and letting the law take its course.
Smith is on record saying that he stands by his decision to bring charges. The evidence, he says, is undeniable: a criminal scheme to overturn an election and prevent a peaceful transfer of power. This isn’t just a political disagreement; it’s an alleged attack on the very principles of fair governance. Trump’s behavior, according to many, isn’t just about political rhetoric; it’s about criminal actions that are alleged to have compromised the integrity of the electoral process.
The fixation on phone records and legal technicalities is baffling. The focus should be on the core issues: the alleged crimes themselves. What’s even stranger is the constant use of “criminal” in quotes when a former president is, in fact, a convicted felon. There’s no need for the extra punctuation; the truth speaks for itself. The sentiment expressed by some is that Smith is a hero for simply presenting the evidence and upholding the law.
We need to look at this whole situation with an action-oriented mindset. The call for a “Project 2029” style approach—sweeping reforms, accountability for those who broke the law, and a strong defense of democratic institutions—is understandable given the circumstances. It’s about ensuring these events never happen again. The idea is to “Flood the Zone” with reform, to safeguard the future.
However, many do not see “scorched earth”. Smith is simply presenting the facts. The whole point is to state the truth and let the chips fall where they may. This testimony, while serious, should not be misconstrued as aggressive. The true test of our country’s values is whether we’re willing to apply the law regardless of political affiliation. Smith seems to be acting as though this is the case.
The sentiment among many is, “No one is above the law.” This sentiment is the foundation of a fair society. No matter who they are, any individual should be held accountable. Smith is just doing his job. It’s about more than just one person. It’s about protecting the rule of law.
This isn’t about sensationalism. It’s about facts. It’s about what happened and how. The idea is that it is not enough to just say Trump committed crimes; the public needs to see the evidence. The public needs to be aware of the facts, and that’s exactly what Smith is doing.
The public can watch the C-SPAN or the YouTube clips and cut through the political grandstanding, focusing on Smith’s testimony. It’s a reminder of the gravity of the situation and the importance of holding power accountable. Republicans’ overt complicity is disheartening. Trump’s actions are described by many as criminal, and they have led to his conviction.
It is hoped that we will see more of this, more truth and more accountability. It’s time for the legal system to work, for justice to be served, and for the people to see it happen.
The lack of action, the delays, and the seeming unwillingness to fully pursue justice is frustrating. Smith had the chance to go hard from day one, and many are perplexed as to why he did not pursue certain lines of investigation more aggressively. It shows a lack of critical thinking to just follow the narrative of a few select entities. This is insanity and a lack of justice on all sides, and many do not want to see it continue. The rapes of women and children should be at the forefront of the actions, not in the back seat. This is not about winning, it’s about delivering justice.