By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted that Donald Trump engaged in criminal activity. Smith’s investigation revealed that Trump was not seeking truthful information regarding the 2020 election results, and Smith’s office did not engage in any spying activities. Legal experts analyzed Smith’s testimony and his ongoing cases against Trump, with many noting Smith’s composed demeanor. Discussions surrounding Trump’s potential use of military force were also addressed, specifically concerning Greenland.
Read the original article here
Jack Smith: ‘President Trump engaged in criminal activity’
So, let’s just jump right in, shall we? The basic premise here is pretty clear: Jack Smith, a name that’s become synonymous with legal proceedings involving Donald Trump, seems to have come to the conclusion – or perhaps, more accurately, is acting on the understanding – that Trump engaged in criminal activity. And frankly, a lot of people seem to agree. It’s not exactly breaking news in the circles where people are paying attention. The sentiment, echoed in various ways, is something along the lines of “no shit, Sherlock.”
The sheer volume of alleged infractions, the investigations, the indictments, the ongoing court battles…it all paints a picture. And the overwhelming feeling is one of frustration. Frustration that it’s taken so long, frustration that there’s not been more decisive action. There’s a distinct feeling of fatigue, like, “Yeah, we know.” The expectation is that those in positions of power, those with the authority to do something about it, will actually *do* something. The delay, perceived or real, fuels the cynicism.
There’s a clear sense that the legal system hasn’t acted with the urgency the situation demands. Some feel that Trump has, and continues to, operate with a sense of impunity. This feeds into the narrative that billionaires, and powerful individuals in general, are somehow exempt from the laws that apply to everyone else. This perception of unequal justice is a constant source of anger, with people remarking on the daily stream of apparent criminal behavior coming from the ex-president.
The concern extends beyond just the individual actions. There’s a broader worry about the larger implications. This is seen as an assault on democracy itself. It’s not just about Trump; it’s about the erosion of norms, the weaponization of misinformation, and the manipulation of the political landscape. The fear is that the country is being taken down a dangerous path. People are worried about the direction this is taking the country.
One of the most concerning aspects is the blatant hypocrisy. The anger flares at the audacity of Trump and his supporters, the way they seem to view themselves above the law. The constant repetition of criminal activity and nobody seems to be doing anything. It’s a cult, one that operates on the denial of facts and the embrace of conspiracy theories. The idea that if you are elected to a certain office that you are untouchable is beyond the pale to many voters.
The phrase “President Trump engaged in criminal activity” seems to be the core of the discussion, but it is expanded upon when considering all the implications surrounding it. From the perspective of many observers, it is not an abstract legal concept but a daily reality. The fact that the debate continues, the legal wrangling drags on, and no single resolution is in sight only serves to deepen the sense of disillusionment. Many feel it has been years too late for this to be happening.
There’s a clear awareness of the disinformation machine. The constant barrage of lies, the manufactured outrage, the divisive rhetoric — these are seen as tools used to manipulate public opinion, to undermine the truth, and to protect Trump. The echo chambers of misinformation, spread by the cult of his followers, are a significant problem. Many see the fight against misinformation as critical to the survival of democracy itself.
It is clear that the use of these tools are effective at getting people to the polls and ultimately winning. The need for an action plan to go against Trump, Putin and other world leaders is apparent. With the constant stream of news and coverage, it’s hard to keep track of all the investigations and accusations. But there’s a strong sentiment that, however delayed, the wheels of justice must turn.
The overwhelming response seems to be one of both anger and anticipation. People are angry at what they see, and anticipating something concrete being done, something that will actually hold those responsible to account. The phrase, “now do something about it” is a common sentiment in this discussion.
The political polarization is also evident. The staunch defense of Trump by his supporters is infuriating to many, particularly those who see his actions as a direct assault on the rule of law. The fact that some of them are defending what seems to be indefensible only adds fuel to the fire.