By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Special Counsel Jack Smith testified, predicting a likely criminal indictment from the Trump administration as part of a retaliatory campaign. Smith, overseeing investigations into Donald Trump, vowed not to be intimidated and acknowledged the challenges faced by his team. The hearing largely revisited the 2020 election, with Republicans criticizing Smith’s methods and Democrats defending his actions. Smith defended his impartiality, emphasizing his apolitical service and experience. The proceedings featured intense questioning on his appointment, investigation costs, and tactics, including payments to a confidential source and obtaining congressional call logs.
Read the original article here
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith Says He Believes Trump Will Try to Indict Him. It’s not really a surprise, is it? The idea that Jack Smith, the man leading the investigations into Donald Trump, expects the former president to retaliate with his own legal maneuvers feels almost inevitable. Given the highly charged political climate and Trump’s well-documented history of counter-attacks, it seems entirely plausible that he’d pursue any avenue to discredit or neutralize those investigating him.
The expectation that Trump might try to indict Smith is certainly not a stretch. It’s been speculated that the motivation is to intimidate and harass those pursuing legal action against him. It’s a tactic we’ve seen before, a way to muddy the waters and potentially tie up Smith in a legal battle, thereby delaying or disrupting his investigations. This strategy fits squarely within the playbook of someone known for his aggressive responses to perceived threats.
The whole situation does seem to be playing out as predicted, where the perception is that Trump’s people would do anything to get him off the hook. This is why people are saying “Breaking news from the Department of Duh”. Smith’s background, including his time investigating war crimes at The Hague, suggests he’s not easily intimidated and is used to dealing with high-stakes situations. That experience probably makes him even more of a target, as Trump might see him as a particularly formidable adversary.
The legal landscape that this plays out in is one where Trump is seen as having a group of people at his disposal that will do whatever he says. The concern, and it’s a valid one, is that the Justice Department under Trump’s influence might try to find some kind of leverage, even if it’s based on flimsy grounds. It’s the old game: “Find something on him. If you can’t find it, make it.” However, many people also believe that the Trump camp is extremely bad at these maneuvers and that any attempt will fail.
The fact that Smith appears unfazed by the possibility is actually reassuring. It suggests he’s prepared for this eventuality and has likely taken steps to safeguard himself and his investigation. There’s a level of respect for Smith for his willingness to take on such a high-profile case. He’s considered a model citizen and a model attorney. Many people are wishing for his success, especially considering his character and past experience.
The potential for this scenario highlights a broader concern about the politicization of the legal system. It raises questions about fairness, due process, and the integrity of law enforcement. If the perception is that the former president is using the legal system to retaliate against his enemies, it damages the public’s trust in the justice system. The hope is that the courts will see through any attempts to weaponize the system for political purposes.
It’s also worth considering the implications of such a move on the political stage. The narrative becomes one of political retribution, potentially further inflaming partisan divisions. It could be used to rally Trump’s supporters and undermine the legitimacy of Smith’s investigations. There’s also the question of whether such an indictment would even be successful, given the potential for political bias to be brought up in any legal challenge.
Ultimately, the fact that Jack Smith anticipates such a move speaks volumes about the current state of American politics and the deep divisions within the country. It reinforces the stakes of the ongoing legal battles and the lengths to which some are willing to go to protect themselves or their agendas. While the prospect of Trump attempting to indict Smith is not something that should be taken lightly, Smith’s experience and preparation could be a source of confidence.