Israel’s military has accepted the death toll compiled by Gaza health authorities as broadly accurate, a significant shift from previous denials. A senior security official estimated approximately 70,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023, excluding those missing, marking the first time Israel has publicly estimated the war’s toll. This admission raises questions about the credibility of the Israeli government and military, particularly regarding civilian casualties. The Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt will also be reopened for pedestrians, although Israel will maintain control over entries and exits.

Read the original article here

Israel accepts health authorities’ Gaza death toll is broadly accurate, saying 70,000 have died. This is a sobering, and frankly, heartbreaking reality. It seems that the initial shock of such a high number is being replaced by the grim acknowledgment that this conflict has indeed resulted in a staggering loss of life. For months, there were claims that the figures were significantly lower, or that the numbers coming from the Gaza health ministry were unreliable. Now, it seems, Israel is largely accepting the official numbers, signaling a crucial shift in the narrative.

The initial response for many, and understandably so, is one of disbelief and horror. The sheer scale of the tragedy is hard to comprehend. The comments reflect this, with many emphasizing the disproportionate impact on civilians, especially children. And let’s be clear, children make up a significant portion of Gaza’s population. To lose so many young lives, over 20,000 as some estimates suggest, is a tragedy that will reverberate for generations.

The acceptance of these figures also raises important questions about the overall death toll, and how the numbers are broken down. How many were combatants versus non-combatants? What role did Israeli military actions play in the loss of civilian life? And, crucially, how has Hamas’s strategy impacted the number of casualties? These are complex and emotional questions that deserve careful consideration, not just knee-jerk reactions of condemnation. The sad fact is, war analysis can be morbid, and this is undoubtedly a unique battleground with its own complexities.

It’s also worth noting the emotional context surrounding this debate. Discussions about war and death invariably trigger strong feelings. The easy accusation of “monster” or “genocide” can stifle nuanced conversations. While the term “genocide” carries immense moral weight and requires a very specific definition, it’s often used loosely, obscuring the details and complexities of the conflict. The focus tends to become solely on the tragedy, while the various factors involved in causing the situation become sidelined.

The fact that the numbers are considered “broadly accurate” by Israel is significant. It seems like the acceptance of the death toll could be a calculated move. While there might be understandable criticism of Israel, the grim reality is that, in modern warfare, civilian casualties are often unavoidable. The estimates of 2/3 of those killed being non-combatants, while tragic, may not be an abnormal outcome in a conflict where the enemy is entrenched within a dense civilian population.

The actual death toll is likely much higher. Some estimates suggest the number may be closer to 200,000. It is critical to recognize that this is just a preliminary count, and the real numbers are likely significantly higher. The deaths that are included in this number are also only those where a death can be directly attributed to military activity. This means anyone who died from conditions related to the conflict but not directly attributable, are likely not included in the total.

It’s important to keep in mind the history here. Similar to previous attacks, the Gaza health ministry’s statistics, although likely an undercount, have been considered broadly accurate. This is not the first time that the figures have been used, and it’s a pattern that has emerged over the years. This means the 70,000 number is the bare minimum, and the actual number of those dead is undoubtedly far higher.

This tragedy highlights the devastating human cost of conflict and the importance of seeking a peaceful resolution. As we reflect on these numbers, it’s essential to approach the conversation with both empathy and a commitment to understanding the complexities of the situation. This war is not just about the numbers; it is about the lives lost, the future shattered, and the ongoing quest for justice and peace.