By John Q. Hosedrinker 
An ophthalmologist in Tehran reported over 400 eye injuries from gunshots in a single hospital, as medical staff struggle to cope with the escalating violence. Doctors describe hospitals overwhelmed with wounded protesters, with injuries concentrated on the head and eyes, suggesting deliberate targeting by security forces. The demonstrations, which began over economic issues, have transformed into the largest anti-government movement since 2009, prompting a severe crackdown by authorities, including internet shutdowns. Rights groups accuse the government of using the blackout to carry out a brutal crackdown. Doctors suspect the death toll is significantly higher than reported, citing a lack of medical supplies and the deliberate targeting of vital organs.
Read the original article here
Hundreds of gunshot eye injuries found in one Iranian hospital amid brutal crackdown on protests, a horrifying reality has emerged, painting a grim picture of the ongoing situation. The information suggests the scale of the violence is far beyond a simple “crackdown,” with reports indicating a deliberate and systematic effort to maim and suppress protestors. The focus here is on the deliberate targeting of protestors’ eyes, using shotguns loaded with birdshot, a tactic designed not to kill but to inflict permanent, debilitating injuries.
The sheer number of injuries is staggering. It is reported that a single hospital, Farabi Eye Hospital in Tehran, treated hundreds of cases in a single night. This fact alone underscores the intensity and brutality of the security forces’ actions. The use of birdshot at head level, specifically targeting the eyes, reveals a calculated attempt to inflict maximum harm while avoiding outright fatalities, likely to minimize international condemnation while still effectively silencing dissent. This isn’t just a matter of excessive force; it’s a strategy of terror.
The intentionality behind this violence is a critical point. The information paints a picture of a regime that views its own citizens as enemies, actively seeking to inflict lasting damage. This perspective appears to be reinforced through indoctrination and the framing of protesters as agents of foreign powers or enemies of the state. This dehumanization of the protesters is a chilling tactic that enables the security forces to carry out such acts without moral restraint.
The comparison to historical instances of state-sponsored violence is also striking. Comparisons to regimes like Stalin’s are not made lightly, but the level of brutality, the systematic targeting of civilians, and the use of violence to maintain power all point to a disturbing pattern. It’s a reminder of the darkest chapters in human history and the horrors that can unfold when a government turns against its own people.
The tactics used by the regime are said to include the use of both birdshot and, in recent days, actual rifles and bullets. The use of this type of ammunition is a clear escalation, pointing towards a level of ruthlessness that is deeply alarming. While birdshot may be designed to cause injury rather than death, the increasing use of live ammunition suggests a willingness to kill, further highlighting the desperate measures being taken to quell the protests.
The role of the security forces themselves warrants examination. They appear to be indoctrinated to see the protesters not as fellow citizens but as enemies of the state, fueled by religious and political ideologies. Their actions are not the result of a momentary decision but a product of training and belief systems designed to ensure unwavering loyalty to the regime. This ideological conditioning is a crucial factor in understanding how such brutality is sustained.
The international response, or lack thereof, raises difficult questions. There’s a debate about the potential for external intervention, and the dangers of escalating a situation are evident. Some comments even address the complexities of how foreign actors might exploit the situation for their own benefit. There’s an understanding that airstrikes alone may not solve the problem, and that ground troops may be needed to effect change. This raises more questions about the proper role of the international community.
The information indicates a deep-seated fear and distrust among the population, a result of the regime’s tactics. This fear is compounded by the knowledge that the security forces operate with impunity, and that accountability is lacking. The regime’s willingness to inflict such horrific injuries, particularly on the eyes, is designed to instill terror and silence dissent.
The situation in Iran is a tragedy, but it’s crucial to acknowledge it as such. The scale of the violence, the deliberate targeting of civilians, and the systemic nature of the repression are deeply disturbing. Understanding the motives of the security forces, the role of indoctrination, and the international complexities is essential for informed discussions. This demands a critical understanding of what is happening.