By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The invasion, marked by the abduction of a head of state, initiated a chaotic situation. While the objectives seemed to include the acquisition of oil and mass deportation, the actions also involved the appropriation of taxpayer funds. These operations are linked to the administration’s other actions, like the seizure of territory. This administration is a criminal enterprise, requiring the impeachment of those involved.
Read the original article here
The case for impeaching Donald Trump, even without the votes to convict, is a complex one, yet it hinges on a fundamental principle: the preservation of democratic norms. While it’s readily acknowledged that Democrats may not possess the necessary support in the Senate for a conviction, the potential impact lies not in a courtroom outcome, but in the court of public opinion.
This strategic approach draws parallels to historical struggles, specifically the fight for women’s suffrage. For decades, the suffragettes faced seemingly insurmountable odds. The votes weren’t there, yet their persistence, their consistent messaging, and their unwavering conviction eventually reshaped public sentiment, and eventually, secured their goal. Similarly, repeatedly bringing forth impeachment proceedings, even if unsuccessful, serves to highlight what Democrats consider Trump’s actions as breaches of conduct, as corrupt behavior, and as actions that should not be tolerated by any individual, regardless of their position.
The argument that impeachment is a futile exercise, a form of “virtue signaling,” overlooks its potential for galvanizing the electorate and challenging the normalization of what many perceive as egregious behavior. The constant exposure of alleged wrongdoings, the public articulation of grievances, and the presentation of evidence, even if not leading to removal, keep these issues at the forefront of the national conversation. It keeps the pressure on, reminds the populace of the stakes, and potentially encourages change.
Furthermore, the act of impeachment, regardless of the outcome, can force accountability, particularly for those within the Republican party. It compels them to take a stand. They are forced to show their loyalty to Trump or to the Constitution. The vote, regardless of its ultimate result, will have long lasting impacts.
Of course, the counter-argument is that such actions might embolden Trump and his base, providing them with a narrative of persecution. But perhaps it is just the opposite. The constant focus on wrongdoing, the continued reminders of his actions, and the attempts to hold him accountable could erode his support over time. Every day the actions are exposed in the news, is a day in which his base may be swayed.
The argument for impeachment, then, is about sending a message. That message will reach those voters who felt ignored, and the court of public opinion will finally get to speak.