By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Minnesota mother witnessed immigration agents apprehend her 5-year-old son and his father, Adrián Alexander Conejo Arias, after they were returning from preschool. According to the mother, Erika Ramos, the agents used the child as a way to get her to open the door, but she refused out of fear of being arrested and leaving her other child alone. Liam and his father were subsequently moved from Minnesota to Texas and are currently in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center. Ramos has reported that her son is sick and not receiving medicine, while the Department of Homeland Security claims the child has been examined and cleared by a pediatrician. A temporary restraining order has been issued to prevent the father and son from being removed from the country.
Read the original article here
“Mommy, open the door”: Mother recounts her terror as her 5-year-old was taken by ICE, is a narrative that instantly evokes a visceral reaction. The chilling scene, a young child’s desperate plea echoing through a terrified mother’s ears, highlights the devastating consequences of immigration enforcement policies.
The core of this incident revolves around a mother’s justifiable fear. The initial press statement from ICE, mentioning an “alleged mother,” immediately suggested a pre-planned operation, a calculated move to target her as well. This wasn’t just about the child; it was about detaining the whole family. The information provided paints a clear picture: ICE could have followed a less traumatic approach. Instead of a detention facility, the child could have been brought to local authorities or child protective services. This would have allowed the situation to be handled through proper channels. Why was this not done? It leaves the impression of malicious intent.
The situation becomes even more disturbing when you consider the broader context. The lack of transparency and the history of dishonesty surrounding ICE’s actions cast a long shadow. This is compounded by the administration’s credibility issues. When those in authority are quick to label people “domestic terrorists” without investigation, it erodes trust and creates a climate of fear and distrust. The agency’s claim that they “attempted multiple times to get the alleged mother who was inside the house to take custody of her child,” but that she “refused,” rings hollow. If ICE’s intention was truly to reunite the child with his mother, why has the child not been returned, especially after the initial fear had subsided? It suggests something far more sinister.
The details are heartbreaking. The confiscation of the child’s bunny hat, a small act of cruelty, is symbolic of the larger dehumanization at play. The assurances made by the agents, that she wouldn’t be taken into custody, only to be contradicted by the potential for arrest if she opened the door, highlight the calculated deception. In their minds, they could not allow her to take custody and re-enter the house because it was professional negligence. They were planning to arrest her the moment she opened that door. They were using her son as bait.
The anger is palpable, and for good reason. It’s an easy thing to feel disgusted by the lack of humanity. The emotional toll of this kind of separation on the child and mother is immense. Imagine the nightmares, the endless “what ifs,” the permanent damage inflicted by such a traumatic event. It’s especially difficult when the mother is pregnant, adding further layers of vulnerability and despair to an already precarious situation.
What do we see in these cases? ICE abuses people and then lies to avoid accountability. The response must be one of unified resistance. The people must demand justice. The world is watching. Those in power must be held accountable.
This isn’t an isolated incident. The article references other alleged lies and abuses committed by ICE. It appears there is a pattern of behavior and an abuse of power. The repeated stories of deception, the disregard for human life, and the tactics employed raise serious concerns about the organization’s practices and its overall mission. It’s not just about the child; it’s about the deliberate use of fear, the manipulation of the legal system, and the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. The article shows it’s not just about the actions, but the lies, the manipulation, and the calculated cruelty.