By John Q. Hosedrinker 
ICE is implementing a large-scale recruitment strategy, aiming to hire up to 10,000 new officers nationwide. This initiative includes a comprehensive social media campaign targeting individuals with interests in areas like UFC fights, patriotic podcasts, and firearms. The campaign will utilize platforms such as Snapchat and Rumble, along with livestreamers and right-wing influencers, to promote recruitment. Furthermore, the agency plans to employ geofencing technology to directly advertise to devices in specific locations, including military bases and gun shows.
Read the original article here
ICE spending $100 million on social media, that’s a staggering figure, isn’t it? It’s hard not to immediately think about all the other critical areas where that kind of money could be used, like healthcare or strengthening social safety nets. Instead, we’re talking about a significant investment in a social media campaign, and it’s making a lot of people question the priorities. The core of this expenditure seems to be about shaping public perception, which includes things like hiring people to boost ICE’s presence and push their narratives online, even potentially right here.
ICE spending $100 million on social media, the purpose appears to be more than just public relations. The underlying sentiment is that this money is being used to spread propaganda, misinformation, and perhaps even to promote a specific political agenda. There’s a strong feeling that the focus isn’t on genuine security or enforcement, but rather on influencing the narrative and justifying their actions. Some see this as an attempt to normalize actions that some people view as oppressive and overly aggressive.
ICE spending $100 million on social media is being interpreted by some as a direct attack on American citizens, funded by American taxpayers. The concern is that this money is being funneled into a system that may be used to harass and intimidate citizens, particularly in areas where they disagree with or protest ICE’s actions. The implication is that this spending is fueling a political campaign, and it’s a very expensive one. The argument is made that this enforcement isn’t even necessary, as other agencies and resources are already in place.
ICE spending $100 million on social media, and the sentiment is one of outrage. It’s perceived as a massive waste of resources, especially when there are so many other pressing needs. There’s a call for boycotts of companies that are seen as supporting ICE’s propaganda efforts, and a strong sense that these funds are simply lining the pockets of media companies without doing any good for the community. The questions being raised are: what is the end goal? What are they really trying to achieve with this?
ICE spending $100 million on social media, and the concerns extend to how this money is actually being spent. There are suspicions that a significant portion could be going towards bots and other automated accounts designed to flood social media with pro-ICE messages, and even flag dissenting opinions and comments. The impact of such actions on other platforms, such as Facebook, are also being questioned. There are also suspicions about which companies are involved in this media campaign.
ICE spending $100 million on social media, and the overall impression is that this is not about promoting safety, but about creating an echo chamber and controlling the narrative. It’s seen as a disturbing use of taxpayer money, particularly when these resources could be directed to more important areas. The fear is that this spending is paving the way for larger actions, possibly even preparing for potential conflict.
ICE spending $100 million on social media, and it’s a lot of money to be pouring into advertising and pushing a particular viewpoint. Some platforms, such as Spotify and even Reddit, have been identified as hosts of these ads. The concern here is about the ethical implications of these platforms providing space for a government agency to essentially recruit on their platforms and promote their actions to the public. The argument goes that these are agencies that should not need to be advertised and that if they are, that may be a hint that things are not as they should be.
ICE spending $100 million on social media, and the implications of this spend go well beyond just an advertisement campaign. Many people feel this is a sign of a larger problem. It’s a question of priorities and whether the money is being used to serve the citizens. Instead, a lot of the money is being spent on something that does not benefit the people, with the argument that the money is being misspent. The ultimate question is whether we, as taxpayers, are going to let them continue this spending.