By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to court documents, a physician who attempted to aid Alex Pretti after he was fatally shot by federal officers reported that ICE agents appeared to be focused on counting his bullet wounds rather than performing CPR. The doctor observed the shooting, noting that Pretti had been shot multiple times and was in critical condition. The physician stated that agents initially prevented them from providing medical assistance, repeatedly requesting their medical license. Despite insisting on assessing the victim, the doctor found no pulse and began CPR while the agents seemed to be counting wounds, as they confirmed to not know whether the victim had a pulse.
Read the original article here
Doctor Who Fought to Treat Alex Pretti Says Border Patrol Moved His Body to Count Wounds Instead of Doing CPR
The chilling account of what happened to Alex Pretti, as described by the doctor who fought to help him, paints a horrifying picture of callous disregard for human life. The core of this story is the assertion that, rather than attempting to provide life-saving CPR, Border Patrol agents prioritized counting the wounds on Pretti’s body. This action, or rather, inaction, speaks volumes about the priorities of those involved in this tragic event. It suggests a chilling detachment from the fundamental duty to preserve life, a duty that should be paramount for anyone in a position of authority, especially those tasked with law enforcement.
The very idea of choosing to count wounds over attempting CPR highlights a fundamental moral failing. CPR is a basic life-saving technique, a last resort to give someone a chance at survival. The fact that it was disregarded, while emphasis was placed on cataloging the damage, indicates that the goal wasn’t to save Pretti’s life. The actions imply an intent to ensure death, rather than preventing it. Some people have wondered if these agents even knew how to perform CPR. It is possible this kind of training is not a priority.
The broader implications are deeply disturbing. The incident suggests that the culture within Border Patrol, or at least among those involved, may be one where human life is not valued above bureaucratic procedures, personal gratification, or even the morbid satisfaction of counting the damage inflicted. These actions certainly seem to suggest an environment where accountability is lacking, or worse, where such behavior is implicitly condoned. It’s almost as if the agents were celebrating the outcome, as suggested by the reports of clapping and other celebratory behavior.
One can’t help but wonder about the training these individuals received and the kind of leadership that oversees their actions. This tragedy prompts questions about vetting, psychological evaluations, and the overall standards expected of those entrusted with protecting the public. The focus should be on how to treat others, but also on how these agents are trained and motivated. The suggestion that these individuals are “not right in the head” raises serious concerns about the criteria used for recruitment and the presence of any mental health checks.
The lack of action, the moving of the body to count wounds, becomes even more poignant when considering the actions of the doctor who was there to help. This was a medical professional, likely dedicated to helping others, only to be confronted with a situation where those entrusted with upholding the law actively worked against preserving life. The juxtaposition of the doctor’s dedication to providing care and the agents’ blatant disregard is stark and deeply upsetting.
This account also forces a reconsideration of the role and mission of Border Patrol. Are they focused on enforcing the law, or something else entirely? The actions described seem far removed from the ideals of public service, suggesting instead a dangerous abuse of power. The fact that the agents allegedly failed to provide aid, and seemingly took pleasure in the outcome, shows a disregard for human life.
The response to this incident should be thorough and transparent. A full investigation is needed to determine exactly what happened, and more importantly, why. The investigation should address the possibility of criminal negligence, reckless endangerment, and the existence of a culture that enabled, or even encouraged, such behavior. The agents involved must be held accountable for their actions and if they are allowed to continue in their roles, it is the public that will suffer.
Ultimately, the story of Alex Pretti, and the actions of the Border Patrol agents involved, is a tragic reminder of the importance of human life and the fundamental duty to protect it. The fact that CPR was ignored in favor of counting wounds tells a story of moral decay.