By John Q. Hosedrinker 
An internal memo from ICE suggests that the agency is allowing agents to enter private residences without a judicial warrant, consent, or an emergency, which could violate the Fourth Amendment. The memo, which has not been formally distributed to all personnel, claims that administrative warrants drafted by ICE officials are sufficient for home entries. Critics, including lawyers and lawmakers, have argued that this policy is unconstitutional and a dangerous overreach of government power. Several officials, including Senator Richard Blumenthal, have called for investigations and hearings into the matter.
Read the original article here
‘The Fourth Amendment Literally Exists to Prevent This’: Memo Claims ICE Can Forcibly Enter Homes Without Judicial Warrants
The Fourth Amendment, as everyone knows, is there to protect us from unreasonable searches and seizures. It’s a cornerstone of our liberties, guaranteeing the right to be secure in our homes. But what if a federal agency, like ICE, started operating as if that protection didn’t exist? That’s the core of the problem here: a memo allegedly suggests ICE can enter homes without a judicial warrant, an action that flies in the face of everything the Fourth Amendment stands for.
The very idea of entering a home without a warrant, except in very specific, legally defined circumstances, is a direct assault on our freedoms. We’re talking about the government, or any agent of it, barging into private residences. It’s a fundamental violation of privacy. A warrant, issued by a judge, based on probable cause, is supposed to be the safeguard, the check on potential overreach. Removing that requirement creates a very dangerous power imbalance. The Fourth Amendment is very clear on this issue; the only way to avoid violating it is to use a judicial warrant.
Some are questioning what this would mean for the role of state police forces. Given the potential Fourth Amendment violations, some people would expect local police agencies to arrest ICE agents for breaking the law. If ICE agents resist, those agents would be charged with further crimes. It all comes back to basic respect for the law and the Constitution.
The implications are disturbing. It raises the specter of overreach and abuse of power. It creates the potential for harassment, intimidation, and the violation of the rights of anyone, regardless of immigration status. If ICE can enter homes without a warrant, then it seems like anyone, regardless of their legal standing, is at risk.
And that’s the scary part, because once this becomes the norm, our rights are eroded. People are left wondering whether they need to resort to self-defense to protect themselves. We start down a slippery slope where the government gets to decide what is reasonable. People feel that the legal system is not working in their best interest, and the courts move too slowly to effectively curb illegal actions.
The situation is worsened by the fact that internal memos are secret. They are the interpretation of the law by an agency, and that’s a problem when it comes to the rights of the people. It’s hard to imagine that such actions would be okay, given the public outcry, and it certainly shouldn’t be. What happens when an agency believes it can do whatever it wants, and the other branches of government don’t provide any checks and balances?
Some are questioning whether the Second Amendment could be used to defend against such actions. If the Fourth Amendment doesn’t hold, the Second Amendment is right there, and many people feel ready and willing to exercise those rights. And that would be a tragedy. But it’s also a direct consequence of a government that believes it is above the law.
And yet, some people still believe that the government can get away with this, and the laws are only for the powerless. This would be a very dangerous state of affairs, one where the government can do whatever it wants and the people have no recourse. Where laws become meaningless, and the only rule is the whims of those in power. If it is being violated from the top down, the entire system falls apart, because people believe the system is not working.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that if you live close to a border or an airport, a 2017 ruling means the Fourth Amendment is basically suspended. This makes it so those people have zero protection, and they’re just left to the mercy of law enforcement. With training facilities for urban warfare being built, it becomes a terrifying reality of a militarized response to civil disobedience, the very opposite of freedom.
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are not just words on paper. They are the foundations of our society, the guarantees of our liberty. To see them treated with such blatant disregard is a matter of grave concern. The very fabric of society is threatened when the government refuses to follow the same rules it imposes on everyone else. This is something everyone should be aware of and fighting against, before the freedoms we hold dear are gone.