By John Q. Hosedrinker 
New footage from the ICE agent’s own camera reveals the moments leading up to the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis. In the video, Good appears calm, even smiling, while her wife films and taunts the agent. Shortly after, the agent, identified as Jonathan Ross, fires his weapon after Good attempts to drive away, hitting him with her car. The incident is currently under investigation by the FBI, although local officials are expressing concerns about the federal agency’s exclusive control of the investigation.
Read the original article here
Killer ICE agent’s new video of Minneapolis shooting released. This is the core of a story that’s sparked outrage and disbelief, and it all revolves around a video – a video that seemingly incriminates an ICE agent named Jonathan Ross. The video, reportedly filmed on his own cell phone, captures the moments leading up to and including the shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis. What’s even more disturbing is the agent’s reaction immediately after the shooting.
The video is described as brutal, and the aftermath of the shooting is shockingly casual. After firing the shots that killed Good, the agent is heard calling her a “fucking bitch.” This callous response, caught on camera, has intensified the condemnation of Ross’s actions. The initial reaction from many is one of utter disgust, with hopes for severe consequences for Ross’s actions. Many are expressing their disgust and disappointment, and even anger at his lack of remorse.
The presence of the cell phone in the officer’s hand is a central point of contention. The question of why an officer, especially one handling a firearm, would be filming with their phone is repeatedly asked. This raises serious questions about professionalism and training. The fact that the footage was released, seemingly with no regard for the damage it does to Ross’s defense, further adds to the bizarre nature of the situation. Some believe this shows the man to be an unrepentant murderer.
The responses and discussions quickly move beyond just the shooting itself, touching on deeper societal issues. The comments make it clear that the video, despite its incriminating nature, is being interpreted differently by different groups. The contrast between how some are reacting to the video and how others are interpreting it highlights the deep political divides. The reactions highlight the issues regarding how we react to the loss of life.
A significant theme emerging is the criticism of the ICE agent’s behavior. Many are pointing out the lack of justification for using lethal force, especially considering the circumstances. The video itself contradicts the officer’s version of events and his immediate reaction speaks volumes. The consensus from those expressing opinions is that Ross had no business discharging his weapon in this situation.
The broader implications of this case extend to discussions about law enforcement training, accountability, and the role of ICE. There’s a prevailing sense that the system is not designed to hold officers accountable for their actions, and that there is a culture of impunity. There is an expressed belief by some that the agent, because of his role, is a dangerous individual, and shouldn’t have been in his position to begin with.
One of the more alarming claims is that some individuals are defending Ross’s actions, and they have been attributed to the MAGA movement. This has sparked discussions about stochastic terrorism, with people arguing that there are individuals and groups who want to be allowed to kill people they don’t like.
There is a significant portion of discussion directed towards the victim and the perceived bias in the aftermath of the events. Many express their sadness for the woman and her death, and they express that her death was unjustified.
The technical aspects of the video itself also come under scrutiny. The editing of the video, the potential for manipulation, and the angle from which the footage was captured are all discussed. Furthermore, there’s discussion about the role of the media in shaping the narrative. There are suggestions that the video is being used to exonerate him, and the comments indicate a skepticism towards the official narrative.
The article mentions that some links to the video may not be working. It suggests alternative viewing sources, which underscores the public’s eagerness to see the footage and form their own opinions.
The article then includes several questions based on the founding father’s writing. These questions, which appear to be lifted from the article, are designed to make the reader question the motives of the government. This is a common theme that continues throughout the discussion.
The overall sentiment is one of outrage and a lack of trust in the system. The shooting is seen not just as a tragic event but as a symptom of deeper problems within law enforcement and society. Many express doubts that justice will be served and fear that the agent will escape consequences.
The final remarks of the article summarize the main points and highlight the core issues at the heart of the case: the unjustified killing of an American, the agent’s reaction, the lack of accountability, and the broader social and political implications of the incident. It ends with a powerful statement of frustration.