By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, questions have been raised about the training of ICE agents. Training for new ICE recruits was reportedly cut in half, from five months to 47 days, a length of time allegedly chosen to reflect the tenure of Donald Trump as the 47th U.S. President. While a DHS official stated that training is eight weeks long, the agency maintains that no essential subject matter has been omitted. The official went on to state that ICE is building a rigorous on-the-job training program and that senior officials mentor, coach and train agents.
Read the original article here
ICE Academy Shortened Its Training to Just 47 Days Under Trump in Nod to the 47th President, Report Claims, and the implications of this, are truly striking. The claim, reported and now a subject of wider discussion, suggests a deliberate shortening of training for ICE agents, dropping from a previous timeframe to a mere 47 days. The symbolic gesture is clear: a nod to Donald Trump, the 45th and, potentially, the 47th President.
The immediate reaction to this is one of shock and concern. Many first responders and law enforcement academies require significantly longer training periods, often measured in months rather than weeks. Firefighter academies, for example, can stretch to nine months, highlighting the potential disparity. To truncate training so drastically raises serious questions about the preparedness and competence of ICE agents, particularly given the already sensitive nature of their work and the high stakes involved.
The irony here is palpable. Many perceive these types of actions as a hallmark of dictatorial regimes, where loyalty and symbolism often trump substance and effectiveness. The “47 day ICE training” as a brand, alongside other potential Trump-related references like the “F47,” raises an immediate red flag. Such behavior risks creating a culture of sycophancy, where reverence for a leader overshadows the importance of rigorous professional standards.
This also touches on the concept of “meritocracy.” The concern that arises is that the standards are being lowered in service of ideological alignment. This brings to mind the old saying “you get what you pay for”. In this case, shortening the duration of training will, almost certainly, reduce the quality of the agents.
Moreover, the context of ICE’s mission and the types of individuals who are drawn to it are critical. The sentiment is that ICE is attractive to those who might be uncomfortable in a more diverse environment. The shortened training period, the reduced standards, all reinforce the belief that the organization is attracting people with very specific inclinations.
The potential consequences are serious. One can imagine a situation where agents are not adequately equipped to handle complex situations, make sound judgments under pressure, or effectively communicate with the public. It raises the disturbing thought: What kind of environment does this create in order to carry out their duties?
The very idea that 47 days is enough to learn how to fulfill such critical and often dangerous tasks is almost insulting. Consider that some are trained for a longer period in order to be a manager at a restaurant.
There’s also a suggestion that these agencies could be seen as a form of “military cosplay”, attracting individuals who seek to mimic military authority without necessarily having the discipline or experience. The lack of proper training may lead to a higher risk of abuse of power, excessive force, and a disregard for the rights of the individuals they are supposed to serve.
It’s critical to realize that there are real-world consequences to this kind of approach. It is not just the number of days of training but also the curriculum. What is omitted in order to fit it all into the shortened timeframe? Is critical training omitted?
The impact of such changes extends beyond simple operational failures. There is a potential to erode public trust in law enforcement and create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. The very fabric of society is threatened when law enforcement is not properly trained. This is especially true when it involves the enforcement of immigration laws.
Ultimately, the argument here is that the focus on symbolism and ego-stroking undermines the core mission of ICE. It endangers both the public and the agents themselves by not allowing them to be fully prepared and able to do their job competently and ethically. The concern of a white supremacist paramilitary group is a real one. These types of concerns warrant a full, transparent, and objective investigation into ICE’s training practices and its broader operational culture.