The House Judiciary Committee released a full transcript and video of Jack Smith’s closed-door deposition, which detailed his reasons for indicting Donald Trump. Smith testified that there was significant evidence proving Trump’s involvement in a “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election and repeated attempts to obstruct justice. During the deposition, Smith emphasized that Trump’s false claims were not protected by the First Amendment and that the former president knew the claims were untrue. Smith also addressed Trump’s attacks on Justice Department employees and his commitment to conducting a nonpartisan investigation.

Read the original article here

House Republicans have indeed released the transcript and video of Jack Smith’s closed-door testimony before the Judiciary Committee, and it’s certainly stirred up a lot of conversation. It’s a hefty release too, with a 255-page transcript and over eight hours of video. It’s important to remember that Smith actually wanted to testify publicly, but that request was denied by the Republicans on the committee.

The timing of this release, on New Year’s Eve, is definitely interesting and has raised some eyebrows. The decision to make it public when news cycles are typically focused elsewhere has fueled speculation about the motivations behind it. Some suggest it’s a calculated move to bury the news, while others see it as a bold challenge to Trump and his allies. There are definitely a lot of angles to consider.

One of the key takeaways from the release is the detail with which Smith laid out his case against Donald Trump. He was incredibly confident and candid, going into significant detail about why he believed he had enough evidence to secure convictions for Trump on the charges of conspiracy to obstruct the certification of the 2020 election votes, as well as the classified documents case. He reportedly detailed the evidence he and his team found to prove, “beyond a reasonable doubt,” that Trump engaged in a “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election results, and that he “repeatedly tried to obstruct justice” in the documents case.

The release also highlights Smith’s impressive composure and straightforward approach during the testimony. Several people have commented on how he handled the questioning, remaining calm and sticking to the facts without getting drawn into personal opinions or taking the bait on any particular issue. This has resonated with some as a sign of his integrity and professionalism, especially in contrast to some of the rhetoric surrounding the investigations.

There’s a clear sense that Smith felt he had a strong case, and the release provides a glimpse into the evidence and reasoning behind his investigations. It’s a reminder of the gravity of the charges against Trump and the thoroughness of the investigation. The fact that the House Republicans, who generally have opposed these investigations, released the information is a topic of much discussion as well. One theory is that this could be a distraction tactic, potentially related to other ongoing investigations or stories. Some believe that the release is meant to offer a counter-narrative to Trump’s claims of a witch hunt.

The reaction to the release has been strong and varied. Supporters of the investigations are praising Smith’s courage and meticulous approach, viewing the video as a critical piece of evidence against Trump. Others are questioning the motives of the Republicans, wondering if it’s a calculated move to appear transparent while simultaneously undermining the investigation, hoping their base won’t believe the words of Jack Smith anyway. The fact that the release is available for public scrutiny, despite being a closed-door deposition, shows the complex political maneuvering that is going on at the moment.

One question that has come up is the potential impact this release will have. The video and transcript are now out there for anyone to see, and it’s a long watch. Some commentators have said that it should be shown on C-SPAN so that everyone knows how sinister, criminal, and disgusting Trump is. While the legal cases against Trump are ongoing, this release provides another way for the public to analyze the evidence and form their own opinions.

The release comes at a critical time, and its implications are far-reaching. It has the potential to influence public opinion, the ongoing legal battles, and the political landscape in the months ahead. It is definitely something to follow closely.