By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following former President Trump’s pardons of over 1,500 Capitol riot defendants, a House committee is now investigating whether any are employed by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. The committee has requested records from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding the hiring of individuals connected to the January 6th attack. Concerns arise from ICE’s rapid hiring spree, fueled by a substantial funding increase, and the agency’s practice of concealing agent identities, making it difficult to identify former rioters. The inquiry was spurred by the appointment of at least one pardoned defendant to a high-ranking Justice Department position, and the committee seeks information on all relevant hires by January 26th.
Read the original article here
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. It’s a question that, based on the tone of the responses, many people believe already has an obvious answer. There’s a strong sentiment that the answer is not just “yes,” but potentially “all of them.” The core of the concern, as expressed, seems to be a deep distrust of the Trump administration and the belief that the former president’s rhetoric and actions directly fueled the January 6th events. This, in turn, has led to a widespread suspicion that those who participated in the riot are now finding employment with an agency like ICE.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. The implication, from the comments, is that there’s something inherently wrong, even dangerous, about this possibility. The focus isn’t just on the legal aspect of the rioters, but on the motivations and ideologies that allegedly drove them. People are referencing groups like the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and QAnon, which are seen as having been present at the January 6th events. There is a concern that these individuals, having been involved in acts of violence and insurrection, are now empowered and in positions of authority within a federal agency.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. The responses seem to indicate that the question itself is almost a rhetorical one. Many feel it’s just a formality, as if the answer is already known and a cover-up is anticipated. The level of cynicism is high, with the common thread being that the authorities likely already know the truth and are either actively concealing it or are complicit in the alleged hiring of these individuals. This lack of faith in transparency is a critical component of the discussion.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. A significant point raised is the potential for these individuals to possess firearms. Many feel that people who are members of such organizations as the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters are not the people who should be handling law enforcement or wielding weapons. There is concern about the potential misuse of power and the implications for those being policed by people with extremist views.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. Another aspect is the potential connection to Erik Prince and Blackwater. Some commenters seem to suggest that Prince’s involvement in the privatization of deportation efforts raises red flags. They mention a proposal to deport millions of immigrants, with the implied connection being that Prince might be employing individuals from the January 6th riot to carry out these deportations.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. The question evolves beyond the simple fact of employment, and becomes about how many, and under what circumstances. It’s not just a matter of “if,” but of the scale of the alleged infiltration. The responses suggest an expectation that the number of rioters within ICE is significant, and that this represents a larger pattern of extremism and bias within the agency.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. The reaction is strong against a question perceived as late to the game, and perhaps somewhat performative. Some people are voicing frustration that it’s taken so long to address the issue. The tone suggests impatience and a desire for more decisive action. Some of the language used is quite strong, including references to “insurrectionists” and calls for accountability, rather than just asking questions. The comments imply that they feel the issue has been obvious for a long time.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. Some of the answers that follow question the legal standing of the people. It’s suggested that their criminal records might render them ineligible to carry firearms, further fueling the skepticism surrounding their potential employment with ICE. The focus shifts to an investigation into possible misconduct, and a possible obstruction of justice.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. Some of the responses make it clear that the focus is on a perceived ideological and moral issue. The use of inflammatory language underscores a sense of outrage. The comments highlight the distrust toward government agencies and the belief that the rioters are essentially “punks” or “gravy seals” who shouldn’t be in positions of power.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. Another aspect of the issue that has been brought up is the role of pardons. The suggestion is that the pardons granted by the Trump administration may have been a way of clearing the way for people to join ICE. In essence, the pardons are seen as a political maneuver to protect individuals and enable them to continue to operate without being held accountable.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. The conversation isn’t just focused on ICE itself, but also on the perceived inaction of certain members of the Democratic party. Some commenters express frustration, specifically calling out Schumer and Jeffries for voting against slashing ICE funding, and wanting them to explain the rationale.
House Democrats ask Trump administration if any Jan. 6 rioters are now working for ICE. Ultimately, the question is seen as a means of seeking information about the potential influence of extremist ideologies within a federal agency and holding the administration accountable. It speaks to a deep sense of unease, distrust, and a demand for transparency. The replies indicate a belief that the answers may be uncomfortable, and perhaps, deeply disturbing.