By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Gregory Bovino has been removed from his role as Border Patrol “commander at large” following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by agents under his command, and will return to his former position. This demotion suggests a shift in the administration’s aggressive tactics, particularly regarding mass-deportation campaigns. Bovino, who had become a prominent figure in the administration’s crackdown on cities governed by Democrats, had previously faced criticism for his public engagement and actions outside of the chain of command. In the wake of the shooting, President Trump has signaled a desire for tactical shifts, with Tom Homan taking command in Minnesota and meeting with local officials to continue discussions.
Read the original article here
Gregory Bovino Gets Demoted, and the news seems to be met with a collective sigh, not of relief, but of something akin to cautious disappointment. It’s a demotion, a shuffling of the deck chairs on a sinking ship, as some might see it. He’s been removed from his position as “commander at large” within Border Patrol and is returning to his previous role in El Centro, California, with retirement looming. The consensus appears to be that this is just a starting point, not a destination.
Demote, prosecute, imprison – those are the words echoing in the aftermath. The sentiment is clear: this single action isn’t enough. Many see Bovino as a scapegoat, a convenient fall guy for a much larger problem. His public persona, his “idiotic comments,” and even his sartorial choices – the “snazzy little coat” – are all mentioned, suggesting he was an easy target, a public face of policies that are far more insidious.
The focus quickly expands beyond Bovino himself. There’s a call for accountability that reaches much higher. Names like Miller and Noem are mentioned, with the underlying implication that they are equally, if not more, culpable. The feeling is that the demotion is simply a public relations move, an attempt to quell outrage, rather than a genuine commitment to justice.
The reaction suggests a deep-seated distrust in the system. The phrase “thrown under the bus” sums up the perception of Bovino’s demotion: a cynical move by an administration desperate to protect itself. There’s a prevailing sense that nothing will fundamentally change. The underlying issues within the agency, the perceived abuses of power, and the overall mission itself are what many want to address.
The narrative quickly shifts to the more serious accusations. The death of Alex Pretti at the hands of Border Patrol agents under Bovino’s command is the catalyst. It’s not just about policy; it’s about the lives lost, the alleged acts of violence, and the perceived culture of impunity within the organization. There’s a call for investigation and prosecution, not just of Bovino, but of everyone involved in the incident.
The discussion delves further into the alleged misconduct. The characterization of ICE agents as “cowards” and the accusation of kidnapping and violence paint a stark picture. The calls to “defund DHS” and “abolish ICE” reflect a complete lack of faith in the existing system. The anger and frustration are palpable, fueled by a feeling that the organization has become a tool of oppression.
Some believe Bovino should not only be demoted but should be barred from retiring with a pension. They suggest he should never have a peaceful day again. It’s not about vengeance; it’s about ensuring accountability and preventing future abuses. The argument underscores a lack of faith in the justice system.
The mention of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her advisor Corey Lewandowski, and the suggestion that their jobs might also be in jeopardy, reveals the scope of the potential fallout. The “commander” title, Bovino’s social media presence, and his alleged defiance of the chain of command are all cited as problematic. It is seen as a tactical move, not a genuine show of accountability.
There’s concern that this demotion is just a temporary fix. There is fear the cycle of replacing one problematic figure with another will continue, without addressing the underlying issues. The call to let Jack Smith be Attorney General suggests a desire for an independent investigator who can hold people accountable, regardless of their position.
The prospect of Bovino facing lawsuits, specifically from the families he’s allegedly wronged, is considered a significant part of justice. The sentiment is that Bovino should be punished for his actions. The feeling of the need for justice is very strong, and the demotion is not the end goal, but the beginning.
The mention of Bovino’s online interactions, including his “tangles” with members of Congress, provides another layer to the story. This adds fuel to the fire, with the phrase, “straight up Nazi,” highlighting the perception of his ideology.
The consensus is clear: the demotion is not enough. Calls for arrest, prosecution, and prison sentences are repeated. There’s an underlying conviction that the entire system needs to be overhauled, that systemic issues need to be addressed. The tone is far from celebratory. It is a beginning.