By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to reports, Border Patrol “commander at large” Gregory Bovino has been removed from his role in Minneapolis and is returning to his old job in California, with the possibility of soon retiring. This shift follows escalating tensions and two fatal shootings involving federal agents and protesters in Minneapolis. While the DHS denied these claims, the move is a response to the recent events, which have also seen President Trump speaking with city and state leaders about reducing the federal presence. Trump is sending border czar Tom Homan to oversee federal operations in Minnesota, a move that signals a shift in the administration’s handling of the situation.
Read the original article here
Greg Bovino removed from Border Patrol role and ‘expected to retire soon.’ The news of Greg Bovino’s removal from his Border Patrol role and the expectation of his impending retirement has sparked a lot of reaction, and it’s clear there’s a strong sentiment on both sides of the issue. The immediate response seems to be a mixture of relief and skepticism. Many see this as a necessary step, a move to address the issues that have been brought to light. Others, however, are wary, viewing this as a token gesture, a way to appease the public without addressing the underlying problems.
This is viewed as a “fall guy” situation, meant to pacify public anger. Some people are cynical and believe that this is simply a distraction, a way for those in power to avoid true accountability. There’s a lot of focus on the idea that Bovino’s removal doesn’t solve the larger systemic issues, and that the underlying problems within the Border Patrol, and potentially other government agencies, will continue. This falls in line with the sentiment of “not enough,” the demand for more than just one person being held responsible.
One common thread is the call for further investigation and legal action. The removal of Bovino is seen by some as just the beginning, with demands for charges, trials, and potentially imprisonment. The lack of charges against others, like Jonathan Ross and those involved in the death of Alex Pretti, is a major point of contention. The belief is that until justice is fully served, this is nothing more than a superficial change.
There’s a strong undercurrent of anger and a desire for accountability. People are not just satisfied with Bovino’s removal, they want to see more people held responsible. There’s a sense that the current administration is complicit, and that they too should be held accountable. The use of phrases like “Nazi” and the condemnation of his actions show the severity of the feelings towards his actions.
The comments also reflect the political climate. The focus on MAGA and the broader political landscape is apparent. The removal of Bovino is viewed by some as an attempt to appease the MAGA base, a way to avoid losing support. The fear is that this will be seen as a victory, allowing for the continuation of controversial policies without real change. There is also a great amount of concern about the effect of this on the midterm elections.
The overall tone is one of frustration and a lack of faith in the current system. The expectation that Bovino will simply retire is viewed negatively and further fuels the demand for justice. The focus remains on getting Bovino and possibly others into a prison and on the need for accountability for the actions of Border Patrol.
The situation has created a sense of moral clarity for some, and a call for a greater reform within the Border Patrol and the Department of Homeland Security.