By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump announced plans to impose tariffs on several European countries, including Denmark, unless a deal is reached for the United States to acquire Greenland, escalating tensions over the Arctic territory. The proposed tariffs, starting at 10% and increasing to 25%, target goods from various European nations and were met with strong criticism from European leaders who viewed the actions as unacceptable. These threats have prompted protests in Greenland and Denmark, with demonstrators expressing opposition to the potential takeover and demanding the right to self-determination. A bipartisan US delegation has traveled to Copenhagen to meet with leaders from Denmark and Greenland.
Read the original article here
‘We are not for sale’: Thousands rally in Greenland and Denmark against Trump’s annexation threat.
The initial reaction to the unfolding situation is one of disbelief, almost like watching a live comedy movie. The series of events, from imposing tariffs to demanding investment guarantees, and then the pressure on NATO allies to increase defense spending, feels like a carefully orchestrated plan, even before the suggestion of annexing a NATO territory.
This feels like a coordinated strategy, and it’s hard not to notice the potential benefits for Putin. The constant sense of unease and violation is palpable. It seems like the US only wants to exploit and take, everything for nothing.
The response from the Greenlandic and Danish people is clear: “We are not for sale.” This sentiment highlights the core issue – the defense of sovereignty. The idea of the US taking territory, by force, is deeply disturbing and has sparked outrage, leading to calls for protest and a united front against the perceived threat.
The shift of the US from a defender of democracy to something that resembles a fascist state is a frightening development for people all over the world. There’s a strong sense of urgency, with people saying that they will stand up for democracy, science, and free speech. They call for the Nordics to unite against this threat. The consensus is that Trump seems to want to take, by force.
The anger is justified, and it’s expressed with a deep sense of betrayal. The feeling that the situation is spiraling out of control is almost overwhelming. Some express fear, others a sense of being trapped, and a desire to fight back.
The idea of the White House being occupied by a mobster who thrives on blackmail, corruption, extortion, threats, and violence has become the new normal. The response of these actions is a call for action: boycotting everything American.
The scale of the protests is considerable, especially in Greenland. The protests themselves may be an act of defiance, a way to show that they won’t be easily swayed. The gravity of the situation is reflected in the belief that the current administration is making things worse and the idea that all of this is leading the country toward a very bad place.
The potential damage to NATO is mentioned, with the acquisition attempt on Greenland serving as an indicator of an alarming breakdown of international relations. The fear of what’s happening in Greenland could break NATO apart. The US slow invading of other countries is similar to other countries operations in other places.
Some people feel that these moves benefit Putin, and that the administration might be helping Russia. The feeling is that the current administration is the master of an interesting alignment of interests. The call for action, however, is a strong push against the status quo, even if the timing is too late.
The need to stand up against the actions, rather than ignoring them is essential. There’s a general sense that the situation has gone too far, and that the only option is to resist. It’s an American problem that everyone feels. The current path leads to failure.