By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s renewed interest in acquiring Greenland, despite its status as a Danish territory and NATO ally, has sparked unprecedented dissent among congressional Republicans. Several prominent Republicans, including Senator Thom Tillis and former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, have publicly condemned the idea, citing concerns about its absurdity, potential damage to US alliances, and its impact on Trump’s legacy. This opposition is fueled by overwhelming public disapproval and warnings from Denmark. Facing potential repercussions, including the end of his presidency according to some, Trump has responded with threats of tariffs against countries opposing his campaign while maintaining that Greenland is necessary for national security.
Read the original article here
Republican dissent as key figures warn Trump against Greenland pursuit is a worrying development, highlighting a stark reality about the state of American politics and the GOP. The fact that any warning is even necessary, concerning a potential move against a NATO ally, illustrates a significant decline. It’s an indictment of the current political climate where even the most basic tenets of international diplomacy and national security seem to be up for debate.
Some Republican figures, like Senator John Kennedy, have voiced their disapproval, calling the idea of invading Greenland “weapons-grade stupid.” But these are just words, and the historical trend with this administration has been a near-complete lack of consequences, and continued alignment with the former president. The issue transcends the specifics of Greenland; it’s about the erosion of established alliances, the destabilization of global order, and the potential for a catastrophic geopolitical misstep. Considering that the US/Trump following through and actually attempting to annex Greenland would have to be the single dumbest geopolitical move by a “great power” country since Hitler’s decision to invade Poland.
The tepid nature of the disapproval within the GOP is particularly alarming. It suggests a party more concerned with maintaining a semblance of unity around Trump than with safeguarding the nation’s interests or adhering to basic moral and strategic principles. This highlights the GOP’s weakness and a willingness to prioritize loyalty over common sense. Some speculate that Putin would be delighted by the destruction of NATO, and that Trump’s actions are helping him achieve this goal. This has led to the belief that the only acceptable “dissent” is impeachment and removal from office.
The military leadership, it’s believed, doesn’t share Trump’s vision, and that the generals hate the man at the head of their chain of command. However, with the former president’s ability to punish dissent, there is the fear that Trump will attempt to primary or ostracize anyone who defies him. This creates a chilling effect, discouraging individuals from speaking out. As an American commentator put it, the invasion would be the geopolitical equivalent of pulling the pin on a grenade in a crowded elevator, leading to the collapse of NATO, the destruction of the US economy, and a devastating loss of global standing.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that many of the dissenters are leaving their positions, which makes their stance seem like a political calculation rather than a genuine stand for principle. It’s easy to grow a spine on the way out the door, as they say. Real change would involve more than just words, it would involve blocking any such actions and enforcing consequences. If Trump were to take over Greenland, it would trigger a geopolitical crisis of unprecedented proportions, leading to economic collapse, international isolation, and a dismantling of the alliance system that has kept the peace in Europe for decades.
Unfortunately, it also appears that as long as the focus is Greenland, there is a way to avoid talking about other issues, such as Jeffrey Epstein. Many in the Republican Party simply say they “dissent”, but nothing happens. The real problem is the double standards.
The consequences of such a move would be far-reaching, setting back relations between the US and the EU for decades and potentially opening the door for China to assume the mantle of economic leadership. To truly stand against this potential action, Republicans in Congress need to actively say no to Trump. But many fear that they will allow him to continue what he is doing because the Republican Party has become complicit.
The lack of any real action by Congress is not unusual. In the past, they’ve often been complicit or compliant, and this has led to a situation where they are now seen as a political joke. If Trump were to attempt to invade Greenland, there will be enemies, both from America’s allies and its own citizens.