By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting following the US’s actions in Venezuela, which were widely condemned as a “crime of aggression.” Multiple countries, including Brazil, China, and Russia, denounced the US’s military strikes and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, viewing it as a violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty and a dangerous precedent. While the US defended its actions as a law enforcement operation, experts questioned the legality, citing a lack of UN authorization and Venezuelan consent. Despite the widespread condemnation, the Security Council remained divided, and a collective response was unlikely due to the US’s veto power.
Read the original article here
US foes and allies denounce Trump’s ‘crime of aggression’ in Venezuela at UN meeting, and it’s frankly, a lot to unpack. The world watched, or perhaps more accurately, muttered under its breath, as a collection of nations – some usually on the opposite side of the diplomatic table, others traditionally allies – expressed their condemnation of the Trump administration’s actions in Venezuela. This whole situation is a masterclass in global frustration, isn’t it? The sheer audacity of the alleged actions – potential strikes, the supposed intent to “snatch” Maduro, and the whole fentanyl angle – certainly raised eyebrows, and not in a good way.
The chorus of denouncements is an interesting mix. You’ve got countries like Brazil, China, Russia, and Cuba, often cast as rivals, all speaking out. Then you have allies, like Spain, adding their voices to the mix. It’s a coalition of the irritated, unified not by shared values, but by a shared sense of… well, you get the picture. They’re all pretty clearly saying, “This isn’t okay.” But here’s the kicker: denouncing something isn’t the same as doing something about it. It’s a strongly worded letter, sure, but what’s the actual consequence? This is the core issue, isn’t it? The world is yelling, but is anyone actually *listening*, and more importantly, are they going to *act*?
And that’s the rub, isn’t it? The feeling that international law is more like a suggestion box than a set of rules with teeth. There’s a deep-seated cynicism that’s hard to ignore. The United States, with its veto power and history of interventions, seems to operate under a different set of rules. The concern is that Trump’s actions, and the lack of serious consequences, embolden this behavior. It sets a precedent, and it’s a dangerous one.
The economic angles here are fascinating, too. The conversation shifts to potential boycotts, the idea of ditching the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and even selling off U.S. debt. These aren’t just diplomatic gestures; they’re economic weapons, and they speak to a real desire to find leverage. It’s about sending a message to the U.S. that there are consequences, even if they’re not military. They’re trying to make them “learn, like a child does, that there are negative consequences to touching a hot stove.” The frustration is palpable.
Let’s be clear, many think this is a huge deal. They see this as a potential violation of international law, a threat to sovereignty, and a general destabilizing force. Some are worried that we’re heading in a really dangerous direction, very quickly. There’s a sense of bewilderment that this is, for many Americans, just another Tuesday. The global ramifications of actions like these are just absolutely massive and yet it seems like life carries on as usual.
Then there is the question of, who is really going to make a difference in all this? The UN is seen by some as being toothless, and the Security Council a “joke,” especially if you have the advantage. Russia and China can point fingers at events that may have taken place in Ukraine or Taiwan. The world is at this strange crossroads.
The statements themselves often feel like they are coming from a place of disappointment. It is a mix of anger and disillusionment at the current state of international affairs. A place where the US is seen as possibly stepping over the line, and yet no one is going to take real action.
Ultimately, it seems that there’s a strong belief that until actual steps are taken, all of these strongly worded statements are a bit of a hollow gesture.