By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring, has agreed to testify virtually before a congressional committee investigating the government’s handling of the Epstein case. Despite previous claims that she would invoke her Fifth Amendment right, her legal team has stated she will not testify. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, has issued a summons and previously declined to offer immunity, but Maxwell’s lawyers argue testifying without immunity and from prison poses security risks and undermines the process. The House Oversight Committee has also voted to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt for refusing to comply with subpoenas related to the investigation.
Read the original article here
Ghislaine Maxwell to testify before US Congress in Epstein probe: Well, this is shaping up to be… something. The news that Ghislaine Maxwell will be, or at least might be, appearing before the US Congress as part of the ongoing probe into the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has certainly stirred the pot. The general consensus, judging from the collective online sentiment, seems to be a resounding “meh.” Or, perhaps a more pointed “Absolutely pointless.” It’s hard to disagree.
Ghislaine’s potential testimony already feels like a foregone conclusion. The expectation is that she’ll be playing a strategic game of minimizing her own involvement and, more crucially, protecting anyone who could potentially help her get a pardon. That’s the unspoken elephant in the room here. It’s hard to imagine her being anything other than incredibly self-serving.
The mountain of documents related to the Epstein case is already out there, and one can’t help but feel that those files, in their cold, hard reality, will paint a far clearer picture than anything Maxwell might say. The problem is, though, that releasing those documents, that’s what everyone *really* wants. Yet, the question then becomes, what’s the point?
And the real kicker? She’s very likely going to invoke her Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination. Her legal team has already made it crystal clear that she’s unwilling to testify without immunity. Basically, they’ve said, it’s not happening.
The whole setup is ripe for political theater, a complete waste of time and taxpayer money. It really does feel like it’s all just going to be a lot of deflection and obfuscation. We’re probably looking at a world-record-breaking performance of dishonest bullshit, with a heavy dose of “I can’t recall” and “I don’t remember.”
Her legal history doesn’t exactly inspire confidence, either. This is, after all, a woman convicted of perjury. A woman who, if the whispers are to be believed, has been enjoying a rather comfortable prison stay. And now, she’s supposed to suddenly transform into a font of truth? Color me skeptical. The timing feels incredibly suspicious, and the possibility of her being coached on what to say, and what not to say, is strong.
The most likely scenario is that she’ll spend the time singing Trump’s praises, while distancing him from the unsavory aspects of the Epstein case. She’ll paint him as a saintly figure and downplay any involvement he may have had. It’s almost guaranteed, at this point. She might even mention names of certain political rivals as a distraction. The whole thing feels designed to protect certain figures, not to uncover the truth.
It’s a huge let down, given everything. If she was genuinely willing to spill the beans on Trump, it might be a different story. But if her only goal is self-preservation, what’s the point? It will be nothing more than a carefully crafted performance designed to get her a pardon.
This entire saga just underscores the fact that the release of the Epstein files is the only thing that would make any of this worthwhile. What exactly is the end game here?
It is the release of the files that should be the priority. This feels like the kind of distraction that really is infuriating to watch. There’s no reason to believe that she’ll say anything truthful. And everyone knows it.
The scenario that’s most likely to be true is that she’s going to deny knowing Trump, and then Trump will pardon her. She’s been in a “club med” prison. And she’ll be going back to a real prison. It’s all a big game, and the children involved are getting the short end of the stick.