By John Q. Hosedrinker 
German media outlets have scrutinized the attire of US Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino, specifically his olive green greatcoat, due to its perceived resemblance to a fascist aesthetic. Commentators, including those at Der Spiegel and Süddeutsche Zeitung, have compared Bovino’s appearance, including his haircut and accessories, to that of Nazi officers. These comparisons have sparked controversy, with some suggesting a deliberate effort to cultivate an authoritarian image. Bovino has denied any such intent, while the Department of Homeland Security has defended the coat as standard issue, though its inclusion in official uniform standards is disputed.
Read the original article here
German media likens US border patrol official’s coat to Nazi look.
It’s pretty striking, isn’t it? The core observation is that German media outlets have drawn a parallel between the coat worn by a US border patrol official and the uniforms associated with Nazi Germany. The coat itself, reportedly a certain style and cut, is being seen as strikingly similar to those worn during the Nazi era. This comparison isn’t about mere fashion; it goes a lot deeper, raising uncomfortable questions about symbolism, intent, and historical echoes. The design, some are saying, is just a little too reminiscent of those old Nazi coats. It’s not a common modern fashion choice, making the resemblance all the more pointed.
This is more than just a passing observation; it delves into the realm of potential provocation. The implication is that someone, somewhere, is deliberately choosing this style to evoke a specific, troubling image. The use of uniforms, the authority they represent, and the visual cues they employ can all be incredibly powerful. When these cues are deliberately reminiscent of a dark chapter in history, it can easily lead to unease and suspicion. Add to this the actions of the border patrol, questions about disregard for rights and the perceived willingness to use excessive force, and the picture becomes even more concerning.
It’s not just the coat; there’s a confluence of factors at play. The Fourth Amendment, protecting against unreasonable searches, is an important part of our rights, and the perceived disregard for it adds another layer to the concern. This all contributes to a sense of things happening that we only see in other countries. The contrast with America’s historical role as a defender of freedom and human rights is especially stark, and quite jarring. The comparison to Nazi Germany is obviously a loaded one, and no one would bring it up without some reason.
The question of how Jewish Americans feel about this is critical. It’s hard to imagine how they could feel anything other than unease. The history of the Holocaust is a wound that can never truly heal, and to see even a hint of those symbols and behaviors again is, to put it mildly, deeply disturbing. The idea that this could be a deliberate message, a targeted signal, is beyond disrespectful. It challenges the very foundation of sanity. It’s not just a fashion choice; it’s a statement.
The world is watching, as the saying goes, and this is the kind of thing that can generate headlines. If the German press, with their unique understanding of the Nazi past, sees these connections, it’s pretty clear something is off. There are other contributing factors, the overall behavior of the border patrol is included. The “sky is blue” is also a common saying, but is obviously being used to show something is obvious. What the Germans see, what they recognize, holds a lot of weight because of their historical context.
The whole picture paints a disturbing portrait, as it does seem that certain actions and behaviors are intentionally aimed at projecting an image of power, authority, and perhaps even ruthlessness. There’s the suggestion of an “us versus them” mentality, of a disregard for the rights of the people being policed. The similarities to the 1930’s Germany are quite troubling. The comparison is strong, and if this were to happen without someone recognizing it… The answer is in the details, like the haircut and the coat.
The argument is also that the hiring criteria seem to be, at times, based on loyalty, rather than the ability to do the job. Some feel this could lead to the selection of those with the same mindset as the upper members. The constant rhetoric, framing the border patrol as heroes fighting a desperate fight, also adds fuel to the fire. And, of course, the desire to “Make America Great Again” has a similar ring to it. But, this isn’t the genocide and World War 3 that Nazis are known for, so the comparison is not exact.
Some are saying it is the style of the coat itself. The cut, the color, and how it is worn are all key factors. And with the border patrol official’s specific hairstyle it all makes the picture complete. There are even suggestions that it could have been designed by Hugo Boss, the fashion designer who clothed the Nazi elite. The choice of coat cannot be an accident. It’s a statement.
The message is clear: if the Germans, who have the lived experience of the Nazi era, are making this comparison, it’s time to listen. If they can recognize the similarities, it should give everyone pause. These connections, whether intentional or not, are deeply unsettling, and they raise serious questions about the direction the country is going. It’s an issue of intent, symbolism, and a dangerous history. The comparison is something to be taken seriously.