By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lieutenant General Gerald Funke has cautioned that Russia may attack NATO nations within the next 2-3 years, with Germany potentially at the center of the conflict. He emphasized that logistical challenges, including the rapid movement of tens of thousands of troops across damaged infrastructure and the management of large numbers of injured, would be paramount. Funke’s command is preparing for these scenarios by modernizing Cold War-era systems, securing transport agreements, and preparing the civilian hospital network. Furthermore, the general highlights the potential complications posed by Germany’s legal framework, which could impede the swift transition from peacetime to crisis conditions due to parliamentary processes.
Read the original article here
German general prepares country for potential Russian attack within 2 to 3 years. The core concept here is that a prominent German military figure, likely a general, is sounding the alarm, suggesting that Germany needs to prepare for a potential Russian military attack within the next two to three years. This isn’t just about conventional warfare; it’s a broader assessment that includes a wide range of threats, from sabotage and cyber warfare to economic disruption and the spread of misinformation, all of which could be considered forms of attack. The sense is that the threat is not solely military in the traditional sense, but a multifaceted challenge to Germany’s security and stability.
The urgency stems from several factors. One is the ongoing war in Ukraine. The general’s timeframe of 2-3 years aligns with the potential conclusion of this conflict. This ending could free up Russian military resources. Another factor is the perception of a looming peak in the risk to the European Union from Russia, driven by both the Kremlin’s actions and the potential for shifts in global power dynamics. It’s a sobering assessment, implying that the time to act is now, not later, as the situation could worsen as the years go on.
The concerns extend beyond just physical military conflict. There’s a recognition that Russia has been engaged in a sustained campaign of influence, aimed at destabilizing Western democracies. This involves the spread of misinformation, the promotion of discord, and active attempts to sow distrust in institutions and governments. This is, in effect, a form of digital warfare, and it is considered a serious attack on democracy.
The potential for internal divisions within Europe, particularly the actions of countries like Hungary, are also highlighted as a vulnerability. The EU’s ability to respond to these kinds of challenges is hampered by internal dissent and the lack of a unified front. It’s a stark reminder that a strong defense requires not just military strength, but also internal cohesion.
A key element of this warning is the need for proactive preparation. The idea is to bolster Germany’s military capabilities, but also to strengthen its resilience to non-military threats. The focus is on a sense of urgency. The warnings are clear: the window of opportunity for Russia might be closing in the future. Now is the time to act.
This assessment considers various possible scenarios, including the impact of Russia’s war in Ukraine, which may well come to an end within the general’s predicted timeline. The impact of sanctions, and internal policies on the Russian economy are also a factor. The conclusion drawn is that if there is a Russian attack, it is more likely to occur sooner than later.
There’s also a sense of frustration with those who dismiss the threat outright. The comments suggest that some individuals might be downplaying the risks, either through naivete or, perhaps, even as a deliberate attempt to undermine preparedness efforts. These reactions range from skepticism about Russia’s military capabilities to questioning the very motivation of those sounding the alarm. This demonstrates a deep concern about the failure of some to acknowledge the depth of the threat.
The discussion also raises the question of international alliances, particularly the role of the United States. Concerns are expressed about potential shifts in US foreign policy and its impact on European security. The possibility of the US withdrawing its support, or even actively working against European interests, is considered. In the world of international politics, the general is signaling that Germany must be able to stand on its own, and rely less on the traditional reliance of the US as NATO’s supplier.
The warning underscores the need for a multi-faceted approach to national security. It is about physical military strength and economic stability. It is also about the internal cohesion and resilience of a country in the face of external threats. The general’s assessment is a call to action.