France: working with allies on plan should US make move on Greenland, the core of this unsettling scenario, underscores a disturbing shift in global dynamics. The very premise—that the United States might contemplate, let alone execute, a move on Greenland—is a stark indicator of a potential fracturing of the established world order. This isn’t just about geopolitics; it’s about trust, alliances, and the foundational principles of international relations. The gravity of such a hypothetical situation demands careful consideration and strategic planning, and France, with its historical role in international affairs and its deep commitment to European stability, would undoubtedly be at the forefront of crafting a response.

The response to any aggressive move by the US, especially against an ally like Denmark (which controls Greenland), would necessitate a unified front. France, in this scenario, would likely work closely with its European allies to devise a coordinated strategy. This wouldn’t be a simple matter of military posturing; it would be a complex dance of diplomatic pressure, economic leverage, and, potentially, military readiness. The goal would be multifaceted: to deter the US from such actions, to protect Greenland’s sovereignty, and to safeguard the broader principles of international law. The immediate steps would involve consultations with NATO partners, emphasizing the collective defense commitments and the inherent dangers of such a unilateral move.

A key element of any such plan would involve the economic sphere. France, alongside its European partners, could impose economic sanctions or trade restrictions against the US. Such measures could target specific sectors or have broader implications, depending on the severity and scope of the US action. This isn’t just about punishing the US; it’s about demonstrating the consequences of its actions and reminding the world of the importance of adhering to international norms. Furthermore, there would likely be discussions around reducing reliance on the US dollar, potentially accelerating the move towards alternative currencies and financial systems. This could include encouraging the sale of US Treasury bonds, which could trigger a liquidity crisis in the US and potentially undermine its economic dominance.

Beyond economic measures, a coordinated military response is also a possibility. While a direct military confrontation is something no one wants, the idea of European nations stationing troops in Greenland or increasing military presence in the region can act as a deterrent. The deployment of French military assets, perhaps a nuclear submarine, to signal unwavering resolve, cannot be ruled out. This is where the importance of a united European defense policy becomes clear, showing that an attack on one is an attack on all. France would have a pivotal role in coordinating such a strategy, leveraging its military capabilities and its strong ties within the European Union.

However, the response wouldn’t be solely focused on immediate repercussions; it would also be about long-term consequences. The fracturing of trust and the potential for a lasting shift in global alliances must be addressed. France, with its diplomatic acumen, would likely be involved in efforts to repair relationships with the US, even while applying necessary pressure. The goal would be to re-establish a framework for cooperation and to ensure that such a crisis never arises again. This could involve seeking guarantees from the US, strengthening international legal frameworks, and promoting multilateralism as the cornerstone of global governance. It’s about ensuring this moment serves as a catalyst for a more resilient and equitable world order.

Ultimately, France’s role in this scenario is critical. It underscores the urgency of creating strong, independent European capabilities. The prospect of the US potentially turning on its allies—something that has been described as a “betrayal of the highest order”—is something that can serve as a catalyst for European unification. France, working with its allies, could take the lead in developing a robust strategy that incorporates diplomatic pressure, economic leverage, and potentially, military readiness. This would protect Greenland, deter future aggression, and reaffirm the principles of a world where alliances matter and international laws are respected. It is a sobering but necessary exercise in imagining a world where long-held assumptions are challenged, and the very foundations of international stability are put to the test.