By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Federal immigration officers have been collecting personal information on protesters and agitators in Minneapolis, including Alex Pretti, who was later shot and killed. Before his death, Pretti had an encounter with federal officers resulting in a broken rib. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a memo to agents to gather information on protesters, using a form to document personal details. DHS has denied maintaining a database of “domestic terrorists” while also investigating anti-ICE activities that have crossed the line into violence.
Read the original article here
Alex Pretti broke rib in confrontation with federal agents a week before death, sources say.
This is a story that demands attention, a story that resonates with a growing unease surrounding the actions of federal agents. The core of it, the chilling truth at the center, is that Alex Pretti, a man now dead, had a broken rib courtesy of an encounter with ICE agents just a week before his death. It’s a detail that, when you really consider it, casts a long, dark shadow over the events that followed. This isn’t just about a broken rib; it’s about a pattern, a potential escalation, and a stark display of the very force they were supposedly meant to wield. The fact that the assault happened because he was vocal about what they were doing suggests a level of retaliation.
The reporting is also clear. They are attempting to frame Pretti as a threat, but it’s hard to ignore the context. The “source” details how Pretti allegedly stopped his car and blew a whistle at ICE agents. From that point, five agents immediately tackled him, and one leaned on his back, leading to a broken rib. Then, they let him go. The contrast is jarring: excessive force followed by an apparent retreat. It’s the kind of thing that makes you wonder what exactly was the objective. Was it just a display of power?
The narrative is being carefully crafted. The reports focus on Pretti, trying to paint him in a certain light. They are already trying to smear him. He becomes the aggressor, but the reality is far more complex. He stood up against what he perceived as injustice. He did what he felt was right, and now, we’re left to piece together the fragments of his story. If we can get a clearer picture of events before his death, it’s possible those events were related. The question is, are we seeing justice being served, or something else entirely?
The reporting also mentions how the Trump administration was trying to create a database of people who oppose the administration. The agents are also gathering information about “agitators” and “protesters,” raising serious questions about the targeting of individuals and their involvement in the protests. This brings up concerns about civil rights and the potential for abuse of power. It begs the question: could these actions be related to Pretti’s death? Was he marked?
The facts, as they emerge, are disturbing. The incident where Alex Pretti had his rib broken is not a stand-alone event; it’s a piece of a larger puzzle. And the way the story is being presented, the language used, and the focus of the narrative all point to a deliberate attempt to control the story, to shape public perception. The use of phrases like “agitators” is no accident; it is a tool of the administration to cast a negative light on those who are speaking out against injustice.
The timing is significant. The broken rib a week before his death. This raises the possibility of a connection between the two events. The fact that the same agents, or others associated with them, were involved in both incidents would raise serious questions about premeditation and intent.
It’s also clear from the comments that there is a deep mistrust of the government and law enforcement. The public’s faith is eroding. People are becoming increasingly concerned about the actions of federal agents and the potential for abuse of power. The comments are filled with anger, frustration, and a sense of helplessness.
The execution on the street is another thing that could very well have been premeditated. The details of Pretti’s death and the broken rib incident cast a long shadow over the actions of the agents. The fact that the agents were aggressive and involved in both events raises questions about motive. Were they looking for a confrontation? Did they know who Pretti was?
In any event, the media’s framing of the story matters. Is the media covering the actions of law enforcement, or are they enabling them? Is the language used by the media contributing to the problem or helping to solve it?
Let’s not forget the bigger picture. This story is just one example of the challenges facing democracy. People have a right to protest, and they have the right to be protected from excessive force. And it’s up to us to make sure that those rights are protected.