By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House is attempting to discredit Good following her death, aiming to portray her as a domestic terrorist. This effort is unfolding without the presentation of any supporting evidence. Video evidence contradicts claims that Good was attacking federal agents, and an ICE agent was recorded using disparaging language after the shooting. This incident has sparked nationwide protests and heightened opposition to immigration enforcement policies, yet the administration’s response has been to accuse protesters of inciting violence.
Read the original article here
The FBI’s current actions, seemingly focusing on Renee Good’s past history following her killing by an ICE officer, present a troubling narrative. Instead of prioritizing a thorough investigation into the circumstances of her death, the focus appears to be on constructing a justification for the killing, a strategy that deeply undermines public trust in law enforcement and the justice system. It feels as if the very institutions designed to protect citizens and uphold the Constitution are being manipulated to serve a different agenda, one that prioritizes protecting the actions of those in power over seeking the truth.
This shift in focus, away from the actual events of the killing and towards discrediting the victim, is a tactic that unfortunately seems to be becoming increasingly common. It’s reminiscent of patterns seen in other high-profile cases where the reputations of victims are dissected and scrutinized, seemingly in an attempt to diminish their value and thereby diminish the severity of the offense committed against them. Whether or not someone was a perfect person is entirely irrelevant when it comes to being shot and killed. The focus should be on the actions of the ICE officer and if the killing was justified.
It’s natural to question the FBI’s motives when their actions deviate from their stated mission. The FBI’s mission, as they themselves define it, is to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution. To seemingly prioritize smearing a victim over a comprehensive investigation into her death raises serious concerns. It suggests a potential bias, a willingness to protect certain individuals at the expense of justice, which is a dangerous trend.
This entire situation lays bare a concerning trend: the erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The FBI and the DOJ are supposed to be impartial arbiters of justice. Yet, the actions taken in this case cast doubt on their objectivity. It’s difficult not to feel as though we’re living in a time where the very foundations of fairness and accountability are under threat. It feels as if the rules don’t apply to everyone, and that those in positions of power are free to act with impunity.
The focus on Renee Good’s past, and the seeming eagerness to find something, anything, that could potentially cast her in a negative light, highlights a disturbing reality: the potential for a character assassination after death. It’s a method used to tarnish the victim and to shift the narrative away from the actions of the person who committed the crime. Regardless of any background, no one deserves to be killed. A person’s past should never justify murder.
It’s especially disheartening when law enforcement engages in this kind of behavior. They’re supposed to be held to a higher standard and serve as a symbol of justice and protection. To see them actively participating in the discrediting of a victim and trying to justify her murder is incredibly disheartening.
It’s easy to see how this can create a chilling effect and further erode public confidence in the system. Why would anyone trust law enforcement if it seems their true goal is to protect their own instead of serving and protecting the public? It reinforces the idea that there is a double standard, that some lives matter more than others, and that those in power are above the law.
The situation surrounding Renee Good’s death, and the way the FBI is handling the investigation, demands attention. We have a right to expect a thorough, unbiased investigation into the circumstances of her killing. The focus should be on what happened, on the actions of the ICE officer, and whether those actions were justified. To do otherwise is a betrayal of the trust placed in our law enforcement agencies and a disservice to the memory of Renee Good.
The fact that top leaders in the Civil Rights Division are leaving their jobs in protest speaks volumes. It’s a sign that within the Department of Justice, some individuals are not willing to stand by and watch justice be subverted. It also speaks to a broader issue about how the current administration is handling cases of police killings.
Finally, it’s worth considering the long-term impact of these actions. The erosion of trust in democratic institutions is a slow process, but once it starts, it can be difficult to reverse. It’s crucial for the public to remain vigilant, to demand accountability, and to hold those in power responsible for their actions. The future of our democracy depends on it.