By John Q. Hosedrinker 
European markets experienced a surge on Thursday following President Trump’s cancellation of planned tariffs on eight European countries, prompting analysts to label it a “Trump Always Chickens Out” (TACO) trade. The FTSE 100, Germany’s Dax, and France’s Cac all saw significant gains, contributing to a broader increase in the pan-European Stoxx 600. This positive shift occurred after Trump had initially threatened tariffs, but reversed course, reportedly after reaching an unspecified deal. The removal of the threat of military action and tariffs provided relief to investors, although concerns remain about their potential return if trade talks falter.
Read the original article here
Taco Thursday: European stocks rise after Trump ‘chickens out’ on tariff threat.
Okay, so let’s unpack this whole “Taco Thursday” situation, shall we? It seems like European stocks had a nice little rally, likely fueled by relief that the threat of tariffs from the U.S. – specifically, the ones that were being bandied about by a certain former president – didn’t materialize. The phrase “Taco Thursday” itself is a clever play on words, as it was used in some media outlets to describe the situation, and it gives us a good starting point. This whole episode, including the market’s reaction, really highlights the way headlines, and the actions of a few key individuals, can move markets. It’s wild how much the market seems to react to what’s being said, even if the actual policies themselves don’t change all that much. The volatility this creates is a game, and it seems like it benefits a select few while regular folks often get caught in the crossfire.
Now, let’s talk about the term “chickening out”. It’s a phrase that’s been tossed around a lot to describe this situation. It kind of implies that the former president was, well, afraid to follow through on his threats. But is that really what happened? Or was it, as some people suggest, a classic negotiating tactic? Some are claiming this is a strategy. Demand something extreme, create a disruption, and then settle for something less, but still achieving a satisfactory outcome. It raises the question: Was this a retreat, or was it a calculated move to get what was wanted?
The market’s reaction, the rise in European stocks, suggests that the perceived outcome was positive, at least in the short term. The media’s framing of the situation as “chickening out” is interesting, and it does have a particular connotation. It seems some people think the media, in framing it this way, is subtly suggesting that the tariffs would have been a good idea, which is a problematic framing given how the public may perceive the situation. Was this a good thing, or were we supposed to want the tariffs?
Another angle is the idea of market manipulation. Some people are convinced that this entire episode, with the threats and the backpedaling, was orchestrated to allow certain individuals to profit. The idea is that these kinds of volatile swings – the initial threats creating fear, then the subsequent relief – can be exploited to buy low and sell high. It’s a cynical view, but not entirely without merit, given the history and how easy this can be.
There’s also the element of political theater. Some people see the former president as someone who thrives on creating drama and then, to some extent, achieving what he wanted to achieve. He seems to grab headlines and use the media’s attention as a tool to leverage negotiation.
Of course, we can’t ignore the elephant in the room: the personality of the former president himself. Some people are saying that it’s simply impossible to plan anything with this person at the helm. He’s unpredictable, and often the reaction to what he says and does is, well, just crazy.
Whether this whole “Taco Thursday” scenario was a calculated strategy, a case of market manipulation, or just another example of political chaos, it’s clear that it had an impact on the markets. European stocks rose, and there was a general sigh of relief. This may have been the result of the former president not following through on his threats.
The whole situation also highlights the dependence the markets have on headlines and the actions of a few key people. This is a very real thing. Even with so much volatility, the underlying fundamentals of the market remain. The constant back and forth creates volatility.
For some, this whole episode has triggered a deeper reflection on how their money is invested. They might be shifting their investments to Europe, motivated by both financial and ideological reasons, such as moving away from the American market, which they see as volatile.
Ultimately, the “Taco Thursday” situation is a complex one. The market’s reaction, the political narratives, the perception of the former president – they all weave together to create a dynamic and sometimes chaotic landscape.