By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following an informal meeting in Brussels, several diplomats reported Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico’s reaction to discussions with Donald Trump, though they did not witness the conversation firsthand. Anonymous sources from four different EU governments and a senior EU official revealed that they were briefed separately on the exchange’s content, which was allegedly triggered by something Trump said. Despite Fico’s known pro-Trump stance and previous support for Washington, he denied the reports, taking to X to denounce the “lies” and assert he did not speak at the informal summit. A White House spokesperson also refuted the claims, labeling them “total fake news.”
Read the original article here
European leader spoke of shock at Trump’s state of mind after Mar-a-Lago meeting, a sentiment that resonates with a growing number of people observing the former president’s public appearances and pronouncements. It’s hard not to feel a sense of unease when considering the implications of such observations, especially coming from someone who, according to the information, has often aligned with Trump’s views.
The details are admittedly sparse, yet they paint a concerning picture. This leader, someone who might have been expected to be more sympathetic, reportedly used the word “dangerous” to describe Trump’s demeanor during their face-to-face interaction. The meeting at Mar-a-Lago, far from being a private, behind-closed-doors affair, has become a lens through which the world seems to be reassessing Trump’s fitness for leadership. The stark contrast between the carefully curated public image and the alleged reality of the encounter has left many, including this European leader, deeply unsettled. The fact that the White House has already dismissed the claims, calling them “fake news,” only serves to amplify the sense of something amiss.
The decline in Trump’s public speaking abilities has been particularly noticeable. His sentences, once characterized by a certain bombastic energy, now frequently trail off into mumbled asides. This “peak grandpa stuff”, as someone aptly put it, fuels the speculation and raises serious questions. It’s not necessarily surprising that an individual nearing 80 might exhibit some cognitive decline, but the denials and the attempts to control the narrative suggest a deeper issue, a carefully crafted facade that is beginning to crack under the weight of reality. The idea of an “ailing evil king” surrounded by advisors, desperately trying to manage the situation, is a troubling image indeed.
The observations made by the European leader, however, were not the only incident of concern. The comments about Trump’s “psychological state” and the “dangerous” description echo what many have been observing for a while. It’s difficult to reconcile the image of a strong leader with the man who slurs his words, rambles incoherently, and often appears to be losing his train of thought. This isn’t just about partisan politics; it’s about the very capacity of someone to lead a nation, a capacity that seems increasingly questionable.
The current situation is reminiscent of historical instances of leaders struggling with mental illness. The comparison to Charles VI of France, whose reign was marked by severe mental instability, is a sobering one. The potential for political chaos and international instability in the age of global politics is very real and needs to be addressed seriously. The former president’s behavior during public appearances, particularly during the Davos forum, where he rambled about swing states at a world economic forum and spoke incoherently, raises doubts about his ability to lead. The fear is that the world may not be ready to forgive this possible damage, and the United States may not be prepared for the consequences of that outcome.
It is disheartening to watch the former president be manipulated and guided like a “meat puppet.” The anticipation for the State of the Union address, where he will be in the spotlight, unfiltered, with limited interpreters or handlers, adds to the anxiety. This will be an opportunity to witness Trump, stripped of the usual media manipulations, and the implications of this prospect cannot be understated.