By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse are detailing how he used the allure of higher education to ensnare and control them, including offering scholarships and arranging university admissions. Victims report Epstein’s promises of financial support were withdrawn when they did not comply with his demands, creating dependence and indebtedness. Congressional inquiries and documents reveal Epstein’s financial operation, and alleged connections with institutions like NYU, Columbia, and Harvard are under scrutiny. These actions appear to be part of a larger pattern where Epstein exploited his ties to academia to infiltrate and control young people.
Read the original article here
Epstein survivors say financier lured them with promise of college education. This is where the story begins, and it’s a chilling one. The narrative paints a picture of a man who preyed on vulnerable young women, using the allure of higher education as a key tool in his scheme. It’s a particularly insidious tactic, tapping into aspirations for a better life and the promise of future opportunities.
The exploitation, according to accounts, went beyond just the initial enticement. There’s a suggestion that Epstein used universities to launder his money, funneling funds through tuition payments that were then “refunded.” The girls/women, often lacking qualifications, were accepted, tuition was often overpaid, and refunds were received, seemingly regardless of attendance. This adds another layer of complexity to the scheme, showing how the promise of education was entangled with financial manipulation and control.
We’re talking about a situation where someone’s tuition was paid and they even earned a degree, even if they stopped attending classes. It’s a twisted perversion of the educational system, weaponized to exploit young women. We should all learn from this. The wealthy and well-connected are sometimes willing to take advantage of young people in ways we can’t even imagine.
This isn’t limited to a single location; it echoes the issues facing young people, especially girls, today. Look at the “influencer” culture, where they flock to places like Los Angeles, hoping to gain followers and income. They often live in social media “houses” with wild parties, with drugs and sex, and can be pulled into a world they have little control over. It’s tough for the government to regulate these groups, and that’s why spreading awareness and encouraging girls to come forward to warn others of the dangers is vital.
The economic desperation also plays a role. Those who are broke and desperate are often more vulnerable, more easily exploited. This highlights the importance of access to education. It is not something to be taken for granted. And, access to education may be a crucial tool in preventing this kind of exploitation in the first place.
Let’s not forget the political context. This situation and the desire for social change. Imagine if education were free, if the allure of a free college education was not what it was. This could have possibly removed one of the key leverages used to lure vulnerable young women.
Consider this: Trump offered to cover tuition at Trump University. This may show how similar tactics were at play. It’s disturbing, and it shines a new light on those already in the shadows. Free college could also reduce the number of people recruited into military service. Free college would also possibly create less victims.
There are also claims of false promises regarding career training. Epstein allegedly promised training to be skilled masseuses, but instead, they were groomed for sex with older men. This underscores the depth of the deception and the abuse of trust involved.
The fact that the victims haven’t come forward in droves is perplexing. There is the suggestion of government cover-ups, and the victims may feel like they have no other options.
This entire situation reveals a disturbing truth about the state of higher education. If higher education were free, would the allure have been removed?
The economic incentives are powerful. They change, but they will always be there, just in a different form. The point is, there will always be something to exploit unless the incentive is removed.