By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Victims’ advocates are expressing outrage over the Justice Department’s failure to meet the congressionally mandated deadline to release all Jeffrey Epstein investigative files. They view this noncompliance as another instance of US officials failing to hold wrongdoers accountable. Attorneys representing Epstein survivors state the department has violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which required the release of files by December 19th. Advocates are calling for an explanation and the appointment of a special master to ensure complete and timely disclosure, aiming to restore public trust in federal institutions.
Read the original article here
Epstein victims’ advocates express outrage over slow release of files, and honestly, can you blame them? It feels like we’re being strung along, given a few scraps here and there while the core truth remains hidden. The overall sentiment is a mix of anger, frustration, and a deep-seated suspicion that something far more sinister is at play. The prevailing feeling is that this “slow release” isn’t slow at all; it’s a deliberate, calculated stonewalling.
The frustration is palpable, echoing the belief that this administration is actively working to bury the story, hoping public interest will wane. There’s a strong sense that those in power are not just delaying the release but actively trying to protect individuals. The calls for action are clear: accountability, transparency, and a demand for the full disclosure of all the files. There’s a distinct accusation of wrongdoing, with phrases like “in direct violation of the law” and calls for specific individuals to be removed from their positions.
The feeling is that those in charge are using tactics to distract the public and wear down the opposition. Some are wondering why a class-action lawsuit hasn’t been started and questioning the involvement of the Justice Department, accusing them of complicity in protecting pedophiles. The rhetoric is intense, and the distrust in the system is obvious, with claims of obstruction and cover-ups.
There’s a prevailing opinion that this is not a matter of mere incompetence or bureaucratic inefficiency; it is a conscious choice. The focus extends beyond the immediate scandal, touching on broader themes of power, corruption, and the erosion of trust in institutions. The lack of transparency has opened a floodgate of cynicism and criticism of the political system.
The demand for releasing all of the files is unwavering. The victims deserve to have their voices heard, and the perpetrators need to be exposed. The current state is essentially no release, and the disappointment is tangible. The administration’s actions are described as a calculated manipulation of public opinion, a “gold-covered turd” designed to deceive and delay.
It is believed that the files may never be released in their entirety until the end of this administration. This perception contributes to a sense of urgency. The hope for actual transparency is dim, and the call for whistleblowers and leaks reflects a deep-seated distrust in the official channels.