By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Department of Justice missed its deadline to explain the redactions in the Epstein files, sparking criticism, particularly after the deletion of 16 files, including one featuring Donald Trump with Epstein. While the DOJ cited privacy concerns as justification, some argue this doesn’t explain the delayed release of millions of files. Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie are now pushing for a special master to ensure the files’ complete release and seeking to hold Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt for non-compliance. The DOJ, using 400 lawyers, estimates the review and redaction process will continue until at least January 20th.
Read the original article here
Key Epstein Deadline Arrives as Attention Turns to Venezuela, and this feels like one of those moments where you have to take a deep breath and sort through a lot of… well, a lot. It’s a situation where multiple things, each significant on their own, are happening simultaneously, and it’s hard to know where to focus first. The overarching sensation is one of… intense distraction, ironically enough.
The core of the matter centers on the Epstein files and a crucial deadline. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee highlighted this timing on social media. They pointed out that a statutory date had arrived, demanding the Department of Justice explain the redactions in the Epstein file releases. This is a big deal. Millions of pages of potentially damaging information related to Jeffrey Epstein, and, crucially, people connected to him, are now in play. The public is supposed to get more clarity about what’s been hidden.
Now, into this already complex situation, we have Venezuela. And the timing, well, it’s raising eyebrows, to say the least. It’s hard not to notice that at the exact moment the spotlight should be on those Epstein files, the conversation has shifted. Some are explicitly calling this an intentional distraction, pointing out the convenient emergence of an international crisis to pull focus. This is where the term “Epstein War” is being used, a way of highlighting the perceived connection and the gravity of the situation. It’s a way of saying, “Don’t let this other thing take your eye off the ball.”
The level of cynicism being expressed here is pretty high. There’s a clear feeling that the actions related to Venezuela are designed to obfuscate the contents of the Epstein files. It’s suggested that Trump’s involvement in both the Epstein scandal and the international incident is deeply concerning. The claim is that we are witnessing blatant moves to protect himself and his associates from scrutiny. It’s not just a coincidence; it’s seen as a strategic maneuver.
This all leads to the obvious question: will it work? Can a crisis, even a manufactured one, genuinely distract the public and, more importantly, the powers that be from the revelations in the Epstein files? Many seem to doubt it, pointing out that those paying close attention already see through the smoke and mirrors. The hope is that the momentum behind the Epstein investigation won’t be stopped, regardless of what else is happening. It suggests that even if there is a deliberate attempt to change the narrative, it will fail.
The language being used here is strong. It’s not just about political maneuvering; it’s about accusations of criminal behavior. Terms like “child rapist,” “pedophile ring,” and “war crimes” are tossed around. It’s about suggesting that a war might be started or other illegal actions taken in order to cover up other illegal actions. This isn’t just a political disagreement; it’s a profound moral outrage.
Another common thread is a deep skepticism about any consequences for the figures involved. There’s a feeling that despite any evidence or revelations, certain individuals will never be held accountable. And if this cynicism is accurate, then the whole situation becomes even more disheartening. It emphasizes the need to be wary of distraction and determined in pursuit of truth and justice.
Ultimately, this whole thing plays out like a grim drama. There’s the looming threat of the Epstein files and the pressure for transparency. Then there is the international incident, possibly intended as a smokescreen, which could possibly have grave consequences. And in the middle of it all, there’s a simmering rage, a sense of betrayal, and a determined effort to keep the focus on what truly matters.