By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Justice Department’s refusal to investigate the fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE Agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis is unwarranted, given the available evidence. While the Justice Department quickly deemed the shooting self-defense, there is a lack of investigation needed to determine if the force used was excessive and if the agent’s intent was unlawful. Key evidence, including video footage and witness accounts, suggests the agent’s actions may not have been justified. A thorough investigation should involve examining the agent’s mindset, training, and any prior uses of force.
Read the original article here
Emerging evidence provides the basis for opening an investigation into the tragic death of Renee Good, allegedly at the hands of ICE agent Jonathan Ross. The very fact of this woman’s death, particularly under the circumstances, should have immediately triggered a thorough investigation. The initial response, or rather the lack thereof, from certain government agencies raises serious questions about justice and accountability.
It’s astonishing that the Trump-era Department of Justice seemingly chose not to pursue an investigation. The potential for Jonathan Ross to avoid any legal consequences, even a deposition, is deeply troubling. This situation highlights a perceived disregard for the law and a troubling bias within the administration. The complete lack of action sends a chilling message.
The overwhelming evidence is not just “emerging,” as the videos of the incident were readily available almost immediately after the event. The fact that video footage, including multiple perspectives, exists of the shooting should be considered more than enough basis for an immediate investigation. It appears the evidence itself was plain to see from the beginning.
Adding to the gravity of the situation, the agent, after firing the shot, seemingly left the scene before medical aid arrived. Such actions, coupled with the nature of the shooting itself, point toward potential premeditation and a disregard for human life.
Further complicating the matter, a 2014 report from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) was referenced, highlighting the dangers and problematic tactics of officers placing themselves in front of suspect vehicles. This report recommended methods to avoid such dangerous situations, including de-escalation techniques. The circumstances surrounding this incident appear to directly contradict those recommendations.
The fact that the ICE agent filmed the interaction, even switching hands to draw his weapon, further fuels the concerns of premeditation. The entire series of events, from the alleged actions leading up to the shooting to the lack of immediate aid afterwards, demand thorough scrutiny.
The investigation should also extend to any individuals who may have denied medical aid to Renee Good. Such actions would represent a further failure of duty.
The reality, as seen by many, is that a woman was murdered on camera. The blatant disregard for human life, coupled with the apparent obstruction of justice, demands justice. The absence of action from certain authorities only strengthens the impression of a lawless and amoral regime.
The idea that there is even a need for further “emerging” evidence beyond the readily available video footage is almost laughable. The fact that the video was seen by many, should have been sufficient to initiate an investigation. It is very difficult to understand how the government could avoid an investigation after seeing the videos of the event.
The lack of investigation has caused many to consider other avenues of seeking justice. It is also important to acknowledge that there is no statute of limitations on murder.
Even considering every conceivable benefit of the doubt for the ICE agent, the evidence presents a serious danger to the public. If the administration’s claims are accepted at face value, even if they contradict other evidence, the agent still poses a risk. At the very least, he should be put on leave, undergo therapy, and receive further training on DHS engagement rules.
The lack of action shows a government sanctioning the alleged murderer of someone they may view as the opposition. If the federal government won’t act, the state of Minnesota needs to. The ability of the state to charge him with murder will prevent any Presidential pardon on state charges.
It’s a tragic situation, and many believe there should be more severe and public consequences. Many believe Jonathan Ross should have been arrested at the scene of the crime.
The situation is made more complex because of potential political interference. It is not clear whether the justice system will provide it. This underscores the need for an independent investigation, free from any perceived biases.