By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Justice Department has initiated a federal civil rights investigation into the shooting death of Alex Pretti by Border Patrol officers in Minneapolis. The FBI will be leading the federal probe, with support from Homeland Security Investigations. Multiple videos have emerged, including those of the shooting and a prior altercation, contradicting initial statements about the events. President Donald Trump has also weighed in, referencing the released video of a prior encounter.
Read the original article here
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and honestly, that news lands with a resounding thud of skepticism, and for good reason. It’s a bit like watching a magician’s act – you know there’s trickery involved, but you can’t quite put your finger on it. The fact that the Department of Justice, the very entity that’s now supposed to be investigating, is also potentially implicated in the events, immediately raises a red flag. The comments are filled with questions about bias, and for many, that’s not just a concern but a perceived reality.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the immediate reaction seems to be a collective eye roll, as if everyone’s already seen this movie before. The prevailing sentiment is that this investigation is more about damage control than genuine pursuit of justice. The idea of the DOJ investigating itself is a common source of derision. People are understandably suspicious, especially given the history of the department, and the fact that it is now investigating a potential injustice committed by federal agents does not sit well with the public.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the suspicion around the investigation is fueled by deep-seated distrust. There’s a widespread belief that the DOJ is compromised, beholden to political agendas, and more interested in protecting its own than in seeking the truth. The mention of the FBI, and the specific agents involved, only intensifies these concerns. The perception is that the fix is in, that the outcome is predetermined, and that the investigation is designed to shield those responsible.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the call for an independent investigation, possibly by the Minnesota Attorney General, is a telling reflection of this lack of faith. People want someone, or some entity, who is truly impartial to step in. The concern about the state of the DOJ and other federal agencies, their trustworthiness, their bias, and the risk of a “whitewash” is prevalent. It is seen as a way of influencing the narrative, manipulating evidence, and ultimately undermining the pursuit of justice.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the discussion delves into the specifics of the situation with Alex Pretti. The article, based on input, asks questions about the circumstances surrounding the shooting, including the identity of the shooter, the actions of ICE agents, and the potential for a cover-up. The fact that the Trump administration had already called Pretti a “domestic terrorist” before any investigation even began further deepens concerns about the investigation’s legitimacy, or that the process is designed to find some type of fault in Pretti.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the talk of investigations being designed to protect some people. There is a deep-seated distrust in the DOJ’s ability to conduct an impartial investigation, and the fear is that this will be another case of “the government investigating the government,” with predictable results. The suggestion that it will be a “dog and pony show” hints at the belief that this is simply a performance, a way to appear like something is being done when in reality, little progress will be made.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the cynicism extends beyond the specifics of the case to a broader critique of the system. The skepticism is about the motivations of the individuals and the system as a whole, and there’s a belief that the DOJ is merely trying to protect itself from potential lawsuits or public backlash. The skepticism highlights a deeper sense of disillusionment with the American justice system, in general.
DOJ has opened a federal civil rights probe into the death of Alex Pretti, deputy AG says, and the feeling is that the DOJ is being forced into action by pressure. The probe is seen as a defensive measure, intended to deflect blame and avoid further scrutiny. In a broader sense, there is the feeling that this is about protecting certain people and, ultimately, serving a political agenda. The expectation is that the investigation will be a farce, producing a pre-ordained conclusion that exonerates those in the wrong.