By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Justice Department is reportedly investigating Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for potential obstruction of federal immigration enforcement, specifically focusing on a possible conspiracy statute violation. The investigation stems from public statements made by the officials. Both Walz and Frey have responded, with Walz’s office denying any official notification of an investigation and both leaders condemning the move as politically motivated intimidation. This investigation coincides with a large-scale immigration crackdown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, resulting in over 2,500 arrests.
Read the original article here
ABC: DOJ investigating Walz, Frey for obstructing federal law enforcement activities. Well, this is a doozy, isn’t it? The news that the Department of Justice is investigating Governor Walz and Mayor Frey is like a shot across the bow, and honestly, the reaction is pretty understandable, given the current climate. It seems the core sentiment is a deep distrust of the DOJ itself. There’s a widespread feeling that the institution’s credibility has been eroded, with many seeing these investigations as politically motivated, a means of harassing opponents rather than seeking justice. The claim is that the DOJ is being weaponized, used to target individuals for political reasons, much like a mafia organization might flex its muscle.
The prevailing narrative suggests that the investigations are about “obstruction,” but the definition seems to be in the eye of the beholder. One specific area of concern seems to center on the actions of law enforcement, particularly in relation to ICE and CBP. The suggestion is that there’s a strong resistance to these agencies, and any attempt to impede their activities is now being characterized as obstruction. There are even strong calls for retaliation and the arrest of ICE agents, highlighting the level of animosity felt by some towards these organizations.
The central grievance appears to be that the DOJ seems focused on investigating those who challenge their actions rather than addressing the actual problems. A key point of frustration seems to be the lack of accountability for law enforcement officials, especially in cases where there are allegations of excessive force or misconduct. The fact that the federal agent who shot Renee Good isn’t the target of an investigation is particularly galling to many. This perceived double standard, where those who are critical of the government are targeted while those in power are protected, is a major source of outrage.
The focus then shifts to the Epstein files, or rather, the lack of their release. It’s suggested that the delay in releasing these files, which are legally mandated, is a deliberate attempt to protect powerful individuals. The belief is that if Trump weren’t implicated, he would have fired those responsible for the delay, further highlighting the belief that the DOJ is acting in bad faith. This ties into the broader narrative that Trump is actively weaponizing the DOJ against his political opponents.
The sentiment that the political opponents are being harassed is prevalent, and comparisons to the Benghazi investigations emerge, which the consensus agrees was political persecution in the past. There’s a clear sense that the DOJ’s actions are viewed as the work of a fascist regime. The implication is that we’re sliding towards authoritarianism, with the government using its power to silence dissent and punish those who dare to question it.
The calls for action are also interesting. The frustration that’s building up appears to be reaching a boiling point. The question is, what can be done? The suggestion is that we cannot afford to wait for justice to be served, and individuals may have to take matters into their own hands to protect themselves. There’s a sense of desperation, a feeling that democracy has been hijacked and that the only path forward is to fight back.
The overall tone is one of profound cynicism and anger. There’s a strong belief that the DOJ is illegitimate, that investigations have become nothing more than tools of political retribution. The feeling of being in a “fascist regime” underscores the gravity of the situation in the eyes of many. The recurring question seems to be, “Where is the justice?”