By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A doctor who attempted to aid protester Alex Pretti after he was shot in Minneapolis has made a declaration in a lawsuit challenging ICE’s use of force. The doctor reported that instead of providing medical assistance, federal agents were counting bullet wounds on Pretti’s body. The doctor, who witnessed the shooting, described the chaotic scene and stated there was no need for violence. Pretti, an ICU nurse, was protesting ICE’s presence when he was shot, and the doctor expressed feeling unsafe in the city following the incident.
Read the original article here
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR. This statement, chilling in its implications, really cuts to the core of the situation. It’s a snapshot of a tragic reality: instead of immediate life-saving efforts, the focus seems to have been on cataloging the damage. This isn’t just about a lack of medical assistance; it’s about priorities. It suggests a detachment from the basic human instinct to help someone in mortal danger.
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR, painting a grim picture. It’s difficult to process the idea that in the moments after a shooting, while a life hung in the balance, the actions of law enforcement were geared towards tallying the impact rather than providing crucial aid. One has to ask what would cause such a divergence from expected behavior? The scene described raises serious questions about training, protocols, and the overall mindset of those involved. Were they adequately prepared for such a situation, or was their focus driven by something else entirely?
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR – The implications of this are vast and disturbing. Imagine the scene: a person has been shot, and every second counts. Rather than immediate first aid, the priority shifts to documenting the physical evidence. The details of the shooting, from the number of wounds to the trajectory of the bullets, become more important than the immediate need to preserve life. It speaks volumes about the value being placed on the individual. This is a situation that demands thorough investigation and scrutiny. It is important to know if any attempts were made to provide medical assistance and whether those attempts were adequate or timely, or if those providing medical attention had the training and supplies.
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR – the contrast in these actions speaks volumes. The basic tenets of law enforcement, and indeed, of human decency, dictate that saving a life should be paramount. The choice to count bullet holes, or search for a weapon, suggests a deeply troubling disregard for human life and a perversion of the role of law enforcement. This isn’t a case of human error; it’s a decision, a choice made in the heat of a moment where seconds can mean the difference between life and death. The chilling account of this scene underscores the need for profound introspection.
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR, the situation paints a bleak picture of the events. It’s a stark reminder of the priorities some officers seem to have, and it raises several questions. Was this a systemic issue, or the result of individual actions? Were the agents properly trained in first aid, and if so, why was it seemingly ignored? Does this also demonstrate a culture of impunity? Answers to these questions are essential. This event has the potential to shake the foundations of trust.
Doctor who attended to shot protester says agents were counting bullet holes rather than administering CPR, the gravity of the situation cannot be overstated. When the focus shifts from saving a life to documenting the damage, it signifies a failure of ethics, training, and leadership. Every action, in the wake of such a tragedy, becomes a testament to what we truly value. What we see here is not just a failure to act, but also a betrayal of the basic principles of humanity. The actions of the agents involved call for more investigation, as well as an independent review.